MedTrace Logo

Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety

NCT07427108 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2026-02-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by:

* Puncture success rate
* Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)

Conditions

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Vascular Diseases

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access

Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sohag University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-02-01
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2027-03-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07427108 on ClinicalTrials.gov