Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

NCT04068714 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 125

Last updated 2019-08-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is an observational retrospective cohort study of all patients consecutively submitted to elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery repair at a tertiary referral centre between 2009 and 2015. Patients were excluded if they were non-elective cases or had complex aortic aneurysms (juxta-renal, thoraco-abdominal or thoracic). Differences between both groups of repair were assessed, as well as short- and long-term complications including medical complications, duration of hospital stay, major cardiovascular events, mortality and vascular reintervention.

Conditions

  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Type of aneurysm repair

In open surgery repair group, aneurysm repair was performed by open surgery including aortobifemoral bypass, aorto-bi-iliac bypass and tubular aortic bypass. In endovascular repair (EVAR group), aneurysm correction was performed by percutaneous approach, femoral cutdowns and aorto-uni-iliac EVARs with femorofemoral bypass.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Sao Joao

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-01
Primary Completion
2018-09-01
Completion
2018-12-01

Countries

  • Portugal

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04068714 on ClinicalTrials.gov