Efficacy Of Eggshell-Derived Nanohydroxyapatite Based Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Xenogeneic Based Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix in Posterior Mandibular Socket Preservation
NCT07404098 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2026-04-14
Summary
After tooth extraction, the alveolar bone, which supports the teeth, undergoes a natural resorption process. This bone loss can be significant, especially in the first few months post-extraction, leading to a reduction in both bone height and width (Araújo et al ,. 2005) Generally, the goal of alveolar ridge preservation is to maximize bone formation while maintaining good soft tissue architecture, As socket preservation has proved high clinical efficacy in maintaining alveolar ridge high and width, there are many materials that have been proposed such as: autogenous bone grafts, allografts, xenografts, alloplasts, dentin graft and PRF. Unfortunately, the previously mentioned grafting material has several limitations have more such as high cost, biocompatibility, osteoinductive limitations and the need for a second surgical site. These limitations encouraged the researchers to test alternative materials and techniques to provide comparable or superior outcomes with fewer drawbacks.
One of the newly introduced materials is eggshell derived nanohydroxyapatite (EnHA). Eggshell-derived nanohydroxyapatite (EnHa) represents a novel and potentially superior alternative due to its biocompatible, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive bone substitute. Preliminary studies suggest that this material.
The synergistic effect of PRF when combined with various graft materials has also been extensively studied. when PR combined with bone grafting materials, it results in enhanced osteoconductive properties of graft materials and promotes efficient bone regeneration. (Yilmaz et al., 2017).
However, up till now, there are no sufficient studies on the clinical efficacy of EnHA as a cheaper and readily available alternative which has superior clinical properties especially when combined with PRF compared to standard xenografts.
Conditions
- Alveolar Bone Resorption
- Socket Preservation
- Wound Healing
- Nano-hydroxyapatite
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Socket preservation using eggshell-derived nanohydroxyapatite-based mineralized plasmatic matrix along with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF).
A whole venous blood (10 ml) is obtained from the patient to prepare the PRF. The 10 ml are divided into: 5 ml for mixing and 5 ml to be used as a covering membrane. Tooth extraction is done comprising minimal surgical trauma to the surrounding bone using periotomes and remaining root forceps. Then, debriding the socket using bone curette will be done. PRF will be prepared as instructed by (Choukroun et al., 2006) The Blood is obtained from the patient and centrifuged for 3000rpm for 10 min The first (5 ml) of PRF will be mixed with the eggshell nanohydroxyapatite- based matrix (EnHA) and it will be placed inside the socket. The second (5ml) of PRF will be used as a membrane. The suturable membrane formation is prepared from fibrin clot by pressing it in PRF Box. Primary closure is done by appropriate suturing technique (Criss Cross Suture/ Figure of 8.)by using resorbable suture material (Vicryl).
- PROCEDURE
-
Socket preservation using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) xenograft along with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF).
A whole venous blood (10 ml) is obtained from the patient to prepare the PRF. The 10 ml are divided into: 5 ml for mixing and 5 ml to be used as a covering membrane. Tooth extraction is done comprising minimal surgical trauma to the surrounding bone using periotomes and remaining root forceps. Then, debriding the socket using bone curette will be done. PRF will be prepared as instructed by (Choukroun et al., 2006) The Blood is obtained from the patient and centrifuged for 3000rpm for 10 min. The first (5 ml) of PRF will be mixed with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) and it will be placed inside the socket. The second (5ml) of PRF will be used as a membrane. The suturable membrane formation is prepared from fibrin clot by pressing it in PRF Box. Primary closure is done by appropriate suturing technique (Criss Cross Suture/ Figure of 8.) by using resorbable suture material (Vicryl).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mona Darhous, Professor · Cairo University
-
Mohammed Fardous Alfardous AlAzm, Bachelor · Cairo University
-
Maie Esmaiel, Lecturer · Cairo University
-
Mohamed Omara, Associate Professor · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-01
- Completion
- 2026-05-02
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Hyaluronic Acid +Hydroxyapatite Vs Hydroxyapatite in Bone Regeneration
NCT05957926 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Demineralized Dentin Allograft Versus Demineralized Dentin Autograft for Socket Preservation
NCT06457373 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Changes in Atrophic Maxilla Treated by Split-crest Technique
NCT02836678 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05374083 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Using "Nanobone" Versus "Autogenous Bone" for Treatment of Patients With Unrestorable Single Tooth.
NCT02613663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT02998632 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT03014388 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Platelets Rich Fibrin Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05781529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Platelets Rich Fibrin and Nanohydroxyapatite in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects
NCT02810548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Autogenous Bone Mixed With Xenograft Versus Xenograft Alone Versus Absorbent Gelatin Sponge
NCT03584984 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Sinus Lift Technique With Simultaneous Implantation Using Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) Versus Nano-crystalline Hydroxyapatite
NCT02577289 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Analysis of 2 Bone Graft Materials in Socket Preservation
NCT07344025 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix With and Without Collagen Membrane in Peri-implant Bone Regeneration
NCT04816110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Composite Plug Vs D-PTFE Membrane in Socket Preservation
NCT06315413 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Demineralized Dentin Graft With Hydrochloric Acid Versus Nitric Acid in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT04393714 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05347017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft From Extracted Tooth Combined With Simvastatin 1:1 Versus Autogenous Tooth Graft
NCT06879171 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft Versus Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft.
NCT03447795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of ALB-PRF With Two Types of Bone Grafts With Putty Form Around Immediate Dental Implants.
NCT06643468 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Quality and Quantity for Three Dimensional Bone Augmentation for Maxilla Using Patient Specific Titanium Meshes Loaded With Bone Marrow Aspirate Mixed With Xenograft Versus Xenograft Mixed With Autografts Only: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05400044 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in the Preserved Socket Using Socket Shield Technique With Autogenous Dentin Graft Versus Preserved Socket Using Socket Shield With Alloplast
NCT05047861 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Material's Histomorphometric Analysis In Socket Preservation
NCT06740110 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Tooth Extraction Using Bovine Xenograft With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane
NCT05791123 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation In Mandibular Molars Using Mixture Of ABB And Autogenous Particulate VS Sticky Bone
NCT03584997 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA