MedTrace Logo

Immediate Implant Using "Nanobone" Versus "Autogenous Bone" for Treatment of Patients With Unrestorable Single Tooth.

NCT02613663 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 18

Last updated 2018-05-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A successful implant therapy require appropriate hard and soft tissue, perfect implant position, appropriate alveolar ridge architecture and integration of the implant. after tooth extraction bone resorption takes place and affect the quantity and quality of the bone resulting in inadequate bone volume for implant placement and future prosthetic restoration and impair the esthetic, so insertion of implant immediately following tooth extraction reduce bone loss and enhance esthetics.the fresh socket of extracted tooth is wider than the implant diameter and the distance between the implant and the bone called Peri-implant gap which influence the stability, osseointegration of the implants and esthetics. using bone graft in this gap between bone and implant enhance osseointegration and post-operative healing. autogenous bone graft considered the gold standard graft material for filling defects as it is osteogenic,osseoconductive and osseoinductive, however this approach obtained from the primary donor site for harvesting bone in the oral cavity which requires longer surgical procedure and produce not enough bone volume. there are several post-operative complication may happen as donor site morbidity and swelling,discomfort and pain, so alternative treatment has been suggested using biomaterials to fill the gap and reduce adverse effect of autogenous grafts.Several studies evaluate the success rate of implants with "autogenous" bone graft versus other synthetic guided bone regeneration materials. Nano porous grafting material as a new synthetic material "nanobone" nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite embedded in a porous silica gel matrix has oseoconductive and biomimetic properties integrate with the host bone. the sub-micron modification in bone substitutes enhance osteogenic property. the objective of this study is to measure surgical time, pain, implant stability and marginal bone loss in immediate implant placement with using autogenous bone graft versus nanobone graft.

Conditions

  • Immediate Implant With Bone Graft

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Immediate implants with nanobone graft

Extraction of unrestorable tooth replaced with immediate implant and use nanobone graft to fill the gap.

PROCEDURE

immediate implants with autogenous bone graft

Extraction of unrestorable tooth replaced with immediate implant and use autogenous bone graft to fill the gap.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Samar Nouby · Oral and dental medicine faculty, Cairo university.

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-07-31
Primary Completion
2018-05-31
Completion
2018-05-31

Countries

  • Egypt

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02613663 on ClinicalTrials.gov