Evaluation of Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix With and Without Collagen Membrane in Peri-implant Bone Regeneration
NCT04816110 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16
Last updated 2021-03-25
Summary
This study focuses on comparing the effect of MPM with or without collagen membrane on delayed implant placement in anterior maxillary aesthetic zone.
Conditions
- Horizontal Alveolar Bone Defect
- Alveolar Bone Loss
Interventions
- BIOLOGICAL
-
mineralized plasmatic matrix with collagen membrane
Two tubes of 9 ml of patient's venous blood were collected, the tubes were placed in the centrifuge machine at 2500 rpm for 12 minutes. The resultant product consists of the following two layers: * A yellow plasma liquid on the top of the tube. * Red blood cells at the bottom. - The yellow part was collected using a syringe and added to a cup that contains the bone grafting material (hydroxyapatite 20% + β-TCP 80%). The whole preparation was mixed for few seconds to obtain MPM. After implant placement, the buccal bone defect was grafted with MPM and covered by collagen membrane
- BIOLOGICAL
-
mineralized plasmatic matrix (MPM) without collagen membrane
Two tubes of 9 ml of patient's venous blood were collected, the tubes were placed in the centrifuge machine at 2500 rpm for 12 minutes. The resultant product consists of the following two layers: * A yellow plasma liquid on the top of the tube. * Red blood cells at the bottom. - The yellow part was collected using a syringe and added to a cup that contains the bone grafting material (hydroxyapatite 20% + β-TCP 80%). The whole preparation was mixed for few seconds to obtain MPM. After implant placement, the buccal bone defect was grafted with MPM.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Alexandria University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Yomna M Abo Serie, BDS · Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
-
Moustafa El Dibany, PhD · Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
-
Gaafar N El Halawani, PhD · Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-04-10
- Primary Completion
- 2020-09-10
- Completion
- 2020-12-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Socket Preservation Using Autogenous Bone Graft Versus MPM
NCT03008538 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Autobone and Bioactive Glass With Ridge Splitting
NCT04814160 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Atrophic Ridges Using Guide Bone Regeneration Technique
NCT06746935 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Xenograft Versus PRF
NCT03177356 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of MPM Prepared From Allogenic Bone Graft in Alveolar Cleft Closure: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03420287 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
The Influence of Vertical Implant Position on the Marginal Bone Loss in Thick Versus Thin Phenotype.
NCT06177275 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites
NCT07239193 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT03014388 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Gelatin Sponge Versus Allogenic Demineralized Bone Matrix
NCT06681857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid in Addition to Xenograft in Immediate Implant Placement Within Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT06783517 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05347017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Ridges Using Mandibular Blocks With and Without Coverage Using Collagen Membrane
NCT04462575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Layered Collagen and Xenograft
NCT05683509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Antiresorptive and Bone Forming Material on Dental Implants
NCT04140006 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Marginal Bone Changes Around Dental Implant Placed With Open vs. Closed Sinus Elevation
NCT06811337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Amnion Chorion Membrane and Demineralized Bone Matrix Putty Allograft in Periodontal Intrabony Defects
NCT02679209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Platelets Rich Fibrin Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05781529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Customized Zirconia Sheet vs PTFE as a Non-resorbable Barrier in Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
NCT06227455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histological Assessment of Autogenous Onlay Block Versus Cortical Shell on Anterior Maxilla
NCT06450535 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Interlocking Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study
NCT06939010 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Demineralized Whole-tooth vs Demineralized Particulate Dentin Grafts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05336149 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Minimally Invasive Subperiosteal Tunneling With Xenogenic Bone Graft and PRF
NCT07079917 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Demineralized and Mineralized Dentin Grafts in Ridge Preservation
NCT07242313 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Vertical Bone Gain After Ridge Augmentation With APRF & Xenograft Vs Collagen Membrane & Xenograft. RCT
NCT03855852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA