To Investigate if the Harvester® Improves Sperm Motility and Blastocyst Utilization (the Percent of Fertilized Eggs That Develop to the Point That They Are Able to be Transferred) in IVF Cycles.
NCT07369362 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1600
Last updated 2026-01-27
Summary
The goal of this prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate whether the SwimCount Harvester microfluidic sperm preparation device can achieve equivalent or superior clinical outcomes compared to standard sperm preparation methods (density gradient centrifugation and swim-up) in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
The study population includes adult couples (female partner age 21-45 years; male partner age ≥21 years) undergoing IVF with PGT-A who meet minimum semen eligibility criteria on the day of oocyte retrieval: pre-processing volume ≥1mL, sperm concentration ≥1 million/mL, and progressive motility ≥10%. A total of 1,600 patients will be randomized 1:1 across 15-25 high-volume IVF centers to receive either Harvester or the site's predominant standard-of-care sperm preparation method. Patients with surgical sperm retrieval requirements or those currently using SwimCount Harvester as standard of care are excluded.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the SwimCount Harvester demonstrate noninferiority to standard sperm preparation methods on blastocyst utilization rate? The primary endpoint is blastocyst utilization rate, calculated as the number of usable blastocysts (operationalized as biopsied blastocysts per clinic standard operating procedures) divided by the number of normally fertilized oocytes (2PN) at the patient level. Noninferiority will be concluded if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the risk difference (Harvester minus standard of care) is greater than -2.0 percentage points, using a site-stratified Mantel-Haenszel analysis. If noninferiority is met, superiority may be reported as supportive evidence when the lower confidence bound exceeds zero.
Does the SwimCount Harvester demonstrate noninferiority to standard sperm preparation methods on the probability of obtaining at least one euploid embryo per retrieval? The key secondary endpoint assesses whether patients have at least one euploid embryo (yes/no) based on PGT-A results from a single blinded reference laboratory (NOVA Genomics). This will be analyzed as a site-stratified Mantel-Haenszel risk difference with a two-sided 95% confidence interval, with an optional noninferiority margin of -2.5 percentage points presented as supportive evidence.
Additional supportive and exploratory questions include:
* How does progressive motility change from pre- to post-preparation with each method? Progressive motility will be summarized descriptively pre- and post-preparation as a supportive laboratory measure without hypothesis testing.
* Do outcomes differ in clinically important subgroups? Pre-specified exploratory analyses will examine advanced maternal age (≥40 years) and severe oligospermia (\<5 million/mL), populations that may derive differential benefit from advanced sperm selection.
* What are the practical implementation considerations? An independent protocol complexity analysis will assess procedural steps, equipment requirements, and standardization benefits by comparing site standard-of-care protocols to the Harvester Instructions for Use.
The study addresses a critical evidence gap by providing multicenter, adequately powered data on whether advanced microfluidic sperm preparation translates into meaningful clinical improvements in IVF success metrics.
Conditions
- Infertility
- Male Infertility
- InVitro Fertilization
- Aneuploidy Rate
- Euploidy Rate
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
microfludics semen processing device
Semen will be processed through this device for patients randomized to the study group arm. It is the only intervention.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
MotilityCount aps
lead INDUSTRY
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2027-03-20
- Completion
- 2027-07-20
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Fresh Vs Frozen Surgical Sperm in IVF
NCT03361982 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Microfluidic Chip Method Versus Density-gradient Centrifugation Method in IVF
NCT06005311 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The EPIC Study: Exploring Paternal Age and the Influence on Blastocyst Culture
NCT06629766 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods
NCT04962074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Advanced Sperm Selection in ICSI: A Comparative Study of PICSI and ZyMot
NCT07240779 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Live Birth Rate After Sperm Selection Using ZyMōt Multi (850µL) Device for Intra Uterine Insemination
NCT06144268 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SprmPik AI Sperm Selection Study SiD, an Assistant for Sperm Selection During Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Medically Assisted Reproduction: Effect on Fertilization, Blastocyst Formation, Early Pregnancy Loss, and Consistent Practice. A Prospective Pilot Study.
NCT06518928 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Automated Sperm Selection
NCT05240469 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Automation of Gamete Preparation, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Embryo Culture, and Vitrification
NCT06074835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microfluidics Versus Density Gradient Centrifugation for Sperm Preparation in IVF
NCT07004309 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sperm Micro-swim up Technique; Process and Select in the Same Dish: a Sibling-oocyte-split Design
NCT05113225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Dry vs Humidified Culture Conditions on Blastocyst Development and Aneuploidy: A Time-lapse Sibling Oocyte Study
NCT07270250 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Semen Processing for ICSI Using Swim-down and Density Gradient Methods
NCT02328534 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Investigating Micro-Manipulation Procedures for Assisted Hatching Timing
NCT06377917 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SISTER: Sibling Oocyte Insemination With Frozen Sperm From Third Party Donors: Evaluation of Reproductive Techniques
NCT07175571 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Piezo-ICSI. - The EPI Study.
NCT04669652 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Sperm Separation Efficiency to Maximize Pregnancy Rates: MACS vs. FERTILE Chip
NCT04061486 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Exosome-Enriched Culture Media to Enhance In Vitro Maturation and Embryo Development in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing IVF
NCT07085312 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Observational Correlation of Sperm Assay Results With Blastocyst Formation
NCT02031549 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Valve of Hyaluronic Binding Selection (PICSI) in Improving IVF Outcome
NCT01916213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sperm Selection by Rheotaxis and Thermotaxis in In-Situ Handmade Microfluidics of Fluidic Walls in the Same ICSI Plate
NCT06243926 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Characterization of Sperm Population Following Different Selection Procedures
NCT05383599 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Split Cohort Trial Comparing IVF Outcomes After the Use of Testicular vs. Ejaculated Sperm for ICSI
NCT03483298 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Slow-freezing to Vitrification of Oocytes
NCT00777387 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of IMSI in Poor Responders to IVF
NCT02358733 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA