Effect of Tidal Volume on fURS Parameters
NCT07304297 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2025-12-26
Summary
The goal of this prospective clinical trial is to evaluate how intraoperative tidal volume settings affect surgical parameters and outcomes in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for kidney stones. The participant population includes patients over 18 years of age with unilateral, single renal stones located in the upper/middle calyx or renal pelvis.
This study aims to answer are:
Does intraoperative tidal volume influence operative time and surgical efficiency during fURS?
Does tidal volume affect laser energy use, lasing efficiency, stone-free rates, and complication rates (infection or bleeding)?
The investigators will compare two groups based on tidal volume recorded during anaesthesia:
Group 1: Low tidal volume (\< 500 mL)
Group 2: Standard tidal volume (≥ 500 mL)
to determine whether tidal volume differences impact surgical performance and postoperative outcomes.
Participants will:
Undergo fURS performed under general anaesthesia with standard ASA monitoring, including ETCO₂ and TOF monitoring.
Have their respiratory parameters (tidal volume, peak airway pressure, PEEP, respiratory rate, ETCO₂) and surgical data (operative time, laser settings, fluoroscopy use, stone-free status) recorded during and after surgery.
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Tidal Volume
- Flexible Ureteroscopy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy
Between October 2025 and December 2025, Patients who underwent fURS surgery in our clinic, with the surgical indication determined according to the EAU guidelines, were included in the study. Patients over 18 years of age with unilateral, single stones located in the upper or middle calyx or in the renal pelvis were included in the study. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pregnancy, a history of abdominal, retroperitoneal, or thoracic surgery, kidney anomalies, or stones located in the lower calyx were excluded.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tarik Emre Sener
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-11-23
- Completion
- 2025-11-24
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.
NCT07238803 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Forced Diuresis After Flexible Ureteroscopy for Medium-Sized Renal Stones
NCT07336485 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With and Without Ureteral Access Sheath in Treatment of Large Renal Stones
NCT06122129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoroscopy Activation Interval in SWL
NCT06689683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients
NCT07345234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Urinary NGAL and KIM-1 After ESWL
NCT07341269 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone
NCT04851171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Treatments for Lower Pore Renal Stone: Microperc Vs FURS
NCT03307096 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL
NCT07334236 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Reverse Trendelenburg Position for Upper Ureteral Stones
NCT04894058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Virtual Glasses on Pain and Comfort During ESWL
NCT05842668 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate the Renal Movement by Single Lung Ventilation in Patients Administered RIRS for Kidney Stones.
NCT03060837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Preop Stent Duration on SFR and Secondary Intervention in RIRS
NCT07052188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
NCT02430168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
NCT06684756 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries
NCT07076589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA