Using Two Different Attachments (Equator Vs Ball and Sockets) Retaining Mandibular Implant Overdenture in Order to See Bone Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution
NCT07241481 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2026-04-02
Summary
Alveolar ridge resorption is an unavoidable consequence in complete denture wearers due to limited retention and stability. Implant-retained overdentures enhance retention, stability, and masticatory performance while reducing ridge resorption and improving patients' quality of life.
Among attachment systems, ball-type anchors have long been favored for their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, the Equator attachment has emerged as a refined alternative, providing superior retention and stability for implant overdentures.
Functional performance can be evaluated through electromyography, which records masticatory muscle activity, and the T-Scan system, which analyzes occlusal force distribution and timing during dynamic occlusion. Additionally, bite force measurement serves as a key indicator of prosthetic efficiency and neuromuscular function, with implant-retained overdentures showing higher values than conventional dentures. This study aimed to compare bone level changes, occlusal force distribution in patients wearing mandibular implant overdentures retained by Equator and ball-and-socket attachments.
Conditions
- Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible
- Complete Edentulism
- Dental Implant
- Attachments
- Implant Retained Overdenture
- Edentulous Jaw
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ball & Socket Attachment
Two implants will be restored using ball-and-socket attachment systems, with the mandibular denture retained over these attachments through corresponding metal housings
- PROCEDURE
-
Equator Attachment
Two implants will be restored using Equator attachment systems, with the mandibular denture retained over these attachments through corresponding metal housings
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Al-Azhar University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 55 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-11-01
- Completion
- 2025-12-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
En Masse Distaliaztion Via Skeletal Anchorage
NCT05245929 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Dentoalveolar Changes of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances on Skeletal Class I Non-extraction Patients With Dental Crowding
NCT07090746 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers
NCT07053410 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
NCT05542745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Outcomes After Receiving Conventional Clasp or Precision Attachment Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT02924142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary Segmental Distalization Using Digitally Printed Appliances
NCT06511219 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness and Apical Root Resorption Changes Associated With Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
NCT02816489 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction Using 0.018-inch Versus 0.022-inch Slot Brackets in Adults
NCT04468295 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Distalization Via Skeletally-anchored Distaljet Appliance With Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations
NCT05171738 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs. Analog Inputs in CAD/CAM Orthodontics: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Palatal Expander Fabrication Workflow
NCT07338591 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries
NCT07311785 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Double Y-shaped Plates and Lag Screws in Fixation of Anterior Mandibular Fractures
NCT04396054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Bite Force Changes After Surgical Correction of the Increased Vertical Dimension
NCT04376645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional and 3D-printed Surgical Obturators for Maxillary Defects
NCT07079163 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Occlusal Stabilization Splints Fabricated Using Conventional Versus Fully Digital Workflow
NCT07074340 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One
NCT05466344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficiency of Clear Aligners in Maxillary Molar Distalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06330571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Custom Titanium Plates vs. 3D Splints in LeFort I Osteotomy
NCT06933628 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Effectiveness of Different Esthetic Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06803433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Multi-looped Lingual Retainer to Relief Anterior Mandibular Crowding
NCT06337435 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Use of Statically Determinate Force System in Closure of Anterior Open Bite in Adults.
NCT04901221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA