Comparison of Conventional and 3D-printed Surgical Obturators for Maxillary Defects
NCT07079163 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2025-07-24
Summary
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications associated with three types of immediate surgical obturators used in maxillectomy patients. A total of 24 patients with acquired maxillary defects will be randomly assigned to receive one of three obturator designs: (1) conventional obturators retained with clasps and wire, (2) resin 3D-printed obturators with printed clasps and palatal screws, or (3) metallic 3D-printed obturators with metal clasps and palatal screws.
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), and postoperative complications such as discomfort, lack of retention, or mucosal irritation . The study seeks to determine whether digital fabrication and enhanced retention methods improve clinical outcomes compared to traditional approaches
Conditions
- Maxillary Defect Reconstruction
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Obturator block
A manually fabricated obturator using a preoperative maxillary cast, retained with clasps and wire. Delivered immediately after maxillectomy.
- DEVICE
-
Obturator block
A digitally designed obturator based on fused CBCT and intraoral scan data. Fabricated in resin using 3D-printing, and retained with 3D-printed clasps and palatal screws. Delivered immediately post-maxillectomy
- DEVICE
-
Obturator block
A digitally designed and 3D-printed obturator fabricated in metal, using CBCT and intraoral scan data. Retention is provided by metal clasps and palatal screws. Delivered during or immediately after surgery.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fatma mahanna
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
fatma mahanna, Phd · Mansoura university, faculty of dentistry
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 36 Years
- Max Age
- 68 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-25
- Primary Completion
- 2025-11-30
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Facial Conformation Meshes for Orthognathic Surgery
NCT06893614 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Effect of Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion
NCT02901678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Outcomes After Receiving Conventional Clasp or Precision Attachment Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT02924142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Maxillary Posterior Teeth Intrusion by Skeletally Anchored Mousetrap Appliance in Adult Patient With Anterior Open Bite.
NCT06757686 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Printing and Three-Dimensional Miniplates in Treatment of Anterior Mandibular Fractures
NCT06898736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of 3D-Printed Anatomical Model on Patient Understanding in Orthognathic Surgery
NCT07068412 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Two Maxillary Expanders for Maxillary Arch Expansion in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
NCT07056296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Effects of 3D-Printed Fixed Twin Block Versus MARA Appliances in Management of Skeletal Class II
NCT07340242 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction With and Without Power Arm
NCT06352996 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances
NCT06366737 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries
NCT07311785 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using Two Different Attachments (Equator Vs Ball and Sockets) Retaining Mandibular Implant Overdenture in Order to See Bone Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution
NCT07241481 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT03572179 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs. Analog Inputs in CAD/CAM Orthodontics: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Palatal Expander Fabrication Workflow
NCT07338591 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Using the Inverted Sequence Approach
NCT03353116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics During Maxillary En-masse Retraction in Adult Patients
NCT03261024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers
NCT07053410 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Custom Plate vs. Standard Titanium Plates for Mandibular Sub-condylar Fractures Fixation
NCT06978530 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Distalization Via Skeletally-anchored Distaljet Appliance With Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations
NCT05171738 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary Versus Bi-Maxillary Posterior Segments Intrusion Adult Subjects With Skeletal Open Bite
NCT04713280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA