Gluma Compared With Bonding Agent for Post-operative Sensitivity Following Composite Restorations
NCT07188142 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2025-09-23
Summary
* The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Gluma desensitizer in reducing post-operative sensitivity following composite restorations in posterior teeth. -Patients visiting OPD will be selected after fulfilment of inclusion criteria. Patients aged 18-45 meeting inclusion criteria and presenting with active primary class I carious lesions on vital molar teeth with ICDAS score 3 will be randomly assigned into two groups: -Group A: Patients will be provided with Gluma desensitizer, Universal Bonding agent and Composite restoration and -Group B: Patients will receive Universal bonding agent and Composite restoration. -The progress of treatment will be followed up immediately (baseline) and at regular follow up visits at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months.
* Post-operative sensitivity will be assessed using an air stimulus and rated on a numeric rating scale for post-operative sensitivity assessment ranging from 0 to 10.
Conditions
- Post-operative Sensitivity
- Dentin Hypersensitivity
- Dental Caries
- Tooth Sensitivity After Composite Restorations
- Post-operative Sensitivity After Class I Composite Restorations
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Drug/Agent: Gluma Desensitizer
Gluma desensitizer applied to prepared tooth surface, followed by universal bonding agent and composite restoration. Application done during the first visit of restorative treatment. Post-operative sensitivity measured at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months.
- DRUG
-
Drug/Agent: No desensitizer (Control)
Universal bonding agent applied followed by composite restoration without prior use of Gluma desensitizer. Post-operative sensitivity measured at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Beenish Hassan
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-01
- Completion
- 2026-06-01
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Gluma and Bioactive Glass Desensitizers in Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity in Cervical Non-Carious Lesions
NCT07063433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
NCT06092567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Polycation-based New Dental Desensitizer on Dentin Hypersensitivity
NCT06378255 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Desensitizing Agent on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restoration
NCT06113874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Varnish Versus CPP-ACP Varnish in the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06154941 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Silver Diamine Fluoride in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation
NCT06165042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Teeth Using Conventional and Bulkfill Composites
NCT06852586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Surface Sealant Application on Clinical Performance Occlusal Restorations
NCT03184025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Seashell Nanoparticles and Gluma Desensitizer on Sensitivity of Teeth
NCT06622018 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
In Situ Remineralisation Response of Different Artificial Caries-like Enamel Lesions to Home-care and Professional Fluoride Treatments
NCT02637830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Universal Adhesives in Terms of Different Application Modes on the Restoration of NCCLs
NCT03415516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Pits and Fissure Sealants on Non Carious vs Initial Carious Enamel Lesions in Posterior Teeth
NCT07330089 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Three Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Management of Enamel Opacities in Patients With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization "Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial"
NCT06135272 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Hypersensitivity Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial
NCT01268605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer
NCT06601972 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System Versus Bulk Filled Resin-based Composite
NCT02479711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Survival Rate of Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Carbomer Cement and Compomer in Occlusal and Proximal ART Restorations
NCT02217098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Psychological Impact of Colored Restorations Cement in Primary Molars
NCT05557682 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Glass-Ionomer Sealing Technique on Hypersensitive Teeth With Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation
NCT05945381 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of GIOMER Based Resin Composite
NCT06021028 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Composite Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Liners: 2-Year Clinical Trial
NCT05470959 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Three Dental Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations
NCT00643461 ·Status: COMPLETED