VISOR Versus PCNL for Treatment of 2-4cm Renal Stones
NCT07159503 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 170
Last updated 2025-09-12
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Vortex Intelligence Stone Optimized Removal (VISOR) works safely and effectively to treat kidney stones that are 2 to 4 centimeters in size in kidney. This study will also look at how VISOR compares to the standard surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
How many participants are stone-free within 24 hours after surgery?
How many participants are stone-free 1 month after surgery?
What side effects or problems, such as pain, fever, or ureter injury, happen with VISOR compared to PCNL?
Does VISOR help keep kidney pressure stable during surgery?
Researchers will compare VISOR to PCNL to see which treatment works better and is safer.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to have surgery with either VISOR or PCNL.
Have imaging tests, such as CT scans or ultrasound, after surgery to check if stones were cleared.
Return for follow-up visits about 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery to check recovery and repeat imaging.
About 170 people will take part in this study at cooperative hospitals.
Conditions
- Kidney Calculi
- Kidney Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Vortex Intelligence Stone Optimized Removal
Vortex Intelligence Stone Optimized Removal integrates irrigation-suction, pressure monitoring-control, and lithotripsy-stone removal functions, aiming to improve stone clearance efficiency, stabilize intrapelvic pressure, and reduce complications.
- PROCEDURE
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
A standard PCNL technique will be performed according to institutional practice guidelines.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Bohan Wang, MD., Ph.D · 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-04-20
- Primary Completion
- 2027-02-20
- Completion
- 2027-08-20
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ho:YAG Laser Versus Thulium Laser for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones During SMP
NCT05190536 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) Versus Traditional Treatment for 4-10 mm Ureteral Stone
NCT03730389 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Disposable 7.5Fr Electronic Flexible Ureteroscope Combined 10Fr Ureteral Access Sheath for Treatment of Renal Stone <2cm
NCT06491524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope vs Nondisposable Fiber Optic vs Digital Ureteroscope
NCT03220516 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Holmium Vs Trilogy Kidney Stones GUY's 1-2
NCT04559321 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Mini-PCNL Versus Standard-PCNL For The Management of 20-40 mm Size Kidney Stones
NCT02635048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra
NCT07087977 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA