Comparison of Canine Retraction Using Ni-ti Closed-coil Springs Vs Elastomeric Power Chains During Orthodontic Treatment
NCT06567730 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46
Last updated 2025-01-30
Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the canine retraction rate (in mm with a 100 mm marked scale) using Ni-Ti closed-coil springs versus elastomeric power chains during canine retraction in subjects with first premolar extractions over a period of three months.
After the extraction of all first premolars under local anesthesia. For canine retraction, Ni-Ti closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains will be randomly allocated to the right and left quadrants of both arches.
Radiographic measurement (root resorption) and clinical measurements (canine retraction, plaque accumulation and gingival health) will be recorded at four points in time. First, at the start of the canine retraction (T0), after first month (T1), second month (T2) and third month follow-up (T3).
Conditions
- Root Resorption
- Plaque Accumulation
- Gingivitis
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Ni-ti Closed-coil Spring
Ni-Ti closed-coil spring is a passive compressed spring made up of super elastic Nickel-titanium. Two eyelets are attached to each side of the coil to facilitate its application. The eyelets will be engaged in the hooks of the second premolar and canine brackets and will apply a force of 150 gm.
- OTHER
-
Elastomeric Power chain
Elastomeric power chains are resilient and latex-free orthodontic materials. They are made up of elastic material and consist of many connected rings. Each ring is engaged in a bracket to apply a force of 175-300 gm.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Munnal Gulzar
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mubassar Fida, BDS,FCPS · Aga Khan University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 13 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-30
- Completion
- 2025-11-30
More Related Trials
-
Mechanical Properties and Clinical Efficacy of Two Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Archwires
NCT03256279 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Crevicular Fluid Cytokine Levels in Response to Orthodontic Forces
NCT03555747 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Cleft Development at Two Time Points of Canine Retraction
NCT07210762 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Friction or Frictionless: What is the Most Effective Method for Retracting Anterior Teeth?
NCT06928896 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05612932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compartive Evalution of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Power Chain Versus Burstone T-loop
NCT05882526 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing a Novel Closed Exposure Technique to a Conventional Method for Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines
NCT06833034 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Occlusal Force Distribution in Digital and Conventional Occlusal Splint
NCT06652217 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-oral Evaluation of Force Decay of Pigmented and Transparent Elastomeric Power Chains:
NCT07300371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Elastic Chains Versus Elastics in Maxillary Canine Retraction
NCT07141836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Fixed Retainers on the Health of the Gums
NCT01314729 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Comparative CT Evaluation of the Amount of Root Resorption in Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
NCT03613285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extraction Space Consumption and Overjet Reduction After Maxillary Anterior Enmasse Retraction in Orthodontics
NCT06823986 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
NCT04905004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Using Water Flosser Versus Interdental Brush on Gingival Health in Patients With Mandibular Bonded Retainer
NCT07054203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Canine Retraction Using Different Bracket Slots' Sizes
NCT05361863 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Crevicular Fluid Characterization During Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04226469 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing the Alignment Efficiency of Three Types of Nickel-titanium Archwires
NCT05676840 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
OC and ICTP in Gingival Crevicular Fluid During Piezocision Accelerated Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04611984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction With and Without Power Arm
NCT06352996 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Stability of Tooth-borne vs Bone-borne Maxillary Expansion: A Parallel Cohort Study
NCT06916299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
NCT06292364 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Oral Hygiene & Root Resorption During Orthodontic Treatment
NCT02745626 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA