Stoma Education Methods and Nurse Learning Outcomes

NCT07061392 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 87

Last updated 2025-07-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether stoma-care training using standardized patients, as compared with low-fidelity mannequins, improved meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, and practical stoma-care skill levels in oncology nurses at a 600-bed tertiary oncology education and research hospital in Ankara, Turkey. The main questions it aimed to answer were:

Did standardized-patient simulation produce greater gains in meaningful learning self-awareness?

Did it yield higher perceived learning scores?

Did it result in larger improvements in stoma-care skill levels?

Researchers compared Group M (standardized patient) to Group K (low-fidelity mannequin) to evaluate which method more effectively enhanced nurses' cognitive and technical outcomes.

Participants completed a 10-item demographic and background survey, answered pre-training assessments on all three scales, attended a two-hour didactic session on stoma fundamentals and evidence-based care, received two hours of hands-on practice with their assigned modality, and completed immediate post-training assessments using the same instruments.

Conditions

  • Stoma Care Knowledge and Skills of Nurses
  • Simulation Based Learning
  • Standardized Patient
  • Nurse
  • Self Awareness

Interventions

OTHER

standardized-patient simulation

Intervention Arm (Group M) Participants randomized to Group M (n = 45 enrolled; 43 analyzed) first completed baseline assessments of meaningful learning self-awareness , perceived learning, and stoma-care skill , as well as a 10-item demographic survey. They then attended a two-hour didactic session-covering stoma indications, types, perioperative care, evidence-based practices, complications, and the stoma-care nurse's role-delivered by a certified stoma-care nurse in small groups. Immediately following the lecture, each nurse participated in a two-hour hands-on simulation with a trained standardized patient. The standardized patient had been prepared with a realistic stoma moulage (transparent drape and egg-biscuit mixture) and received two hours of role-training. Simulation sessions adhered to INACSL Standards ("pre-briefing," "in-scenario," "observation," and "debrief

OTHER

a low-fidelity Prestan 2000 adult CPR mannequin modified with a play-dough stoma model

Control Arm (Group K) Participants randomized to Group K (n = 45 enrolled; 44 analyzed) underwent the identical sequence of baseline assessments and the same two-hour didactic session as Group M. For the practical component, they performed stoma-care simulation on a low-fidelity Prestan 2000 adult CPR mannequin modified with a play-dough stoma model. Hands-on practice was structured in small groups over two hours and included: Pre-briefing: Overview of objectives and materials. In-scenario: Individual stoma-care performance on the mannequin, guided by the certified stoma-care nurse with cueing as needed. Observation: Peers observed from a separate area with scenario summaries. Debriefing: Reflection and feedback using the PEARLS framework to consolidate learning and discuss transfer to clinical practice. Immediate post-training assessments using the same three scales captured outcomes in meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, and stoma-care skill level.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Merve Beke, MsC · Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-01
Primary Completion
2024-05-01
Completion
2024-07-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07061392 on ClinicalTrials.gov