MedTrace Logo

The Effects of GMA-TULIP, I-gel, and BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask in Surgeries With Lateral Position Under General Anesthesia

NCT06782841 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 102

Last updated 2025-01-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of traditional inflatable laryngeal mask, i-gel non-inflatable laryngeal mask and GMA-TULIP non-inflatable laryngeal mask in surgeries with lateral position under general anesthesia, so that providing evidence for the selection of laryngeal mask in surgeries with lateral position.

Conditions

  • Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure

Interventions

DEVICE

GMA-TULIP Laryngeal Mask

After the anesthesia induction, use the GMA-TULIP laryngeal mask as the airway ventilation device.

DEVICE

i-gel Laryngeal Mask

After the anesthesia induction, use the i-gel laryngeal mask as an airway ventilation device.

DEVICE

BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask

After the anesthesia induction is over, use the BlockBuster laryngeal mask as the airway ventilation device.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bing Chen · The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-08-21
Primary Completion
2026-06-01
Completion
2026-06-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06782841 on ClinicalTrials.gov