MedTrace Logo

Comparing the Clinical Performance of BlockBuster vs Proseal-LMA in Unparalysed Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

NCT06058481 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2023-09-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients aged 19 to 78 years with ASA status I-II scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, were recruited and randomized into two groups, Group A (BlockBuster) and Group B (Proseal-LMA). Anesthesia induction for both groups was standardized with no paralysis given. Supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion (either Blockbuster or Proseal-LMA) was executed by a single experienced investigator. The investigator inserted the BlockBuster in Group A patients and the Proseal-LMA in Group B patients. These parameters were compared between the groups; the number of attempts, time taken to achieve successful insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), fiberoptic view of SGA position, hemodynamics changes and complications from the insertion.

Conditions

  • Supraglottic Airway Device

Interventions

DEVICE

Blockbuster

The investigator inserted the BlockBuster in Group A patients.

DEVICE

Proseal-LMA

The investigator inserted the Proseal-LMA in Group B patients.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Maryam Budiman, M.D. · Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-07-31
Primary Completion
2020-07-31
Completion
2020-07-31

Countries

  • Malaysia

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06058481 on ClinicalTrials.gov