Comparison of Clinical Performance of the Guardian Laryngeal Mask With LMA Proseal

NCT02063516 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2015-01-26

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

To compare insertion characteristics of 2 different supraglottic devices (Guardian LMA and Proseal LMA) and to observe any associated complications.

Conditions

  • Efficacy of Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure

Interventions

DEVICE

Guardian Laryngeal Mask

Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.

DEVICE

Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway

Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-06-30
Primary Completion
2014-08-31
Completion
2014-11-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02063516 on ClinicalTrials.gov