Comparison of the LMA Protector and the I-gel

NCT03078517 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 110

Last updated 2018-02-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Investigators aim to compare two supraglottic airway devices; the i-gel and the newly developed laryngeal mask airway protector in terms of airway sealing effect, the insertion success rate, and the incidence of complications in anesthetized patients.

Conditions

  • Mechanical Ventilation

Interventions

DEVICE

I-gel

After the induction of anesthesia, i-gel is inserted along the palatopharyngeal curve.

DEVICE

Laryngeal mask airway protector

After the inudction of anesthesia, laryngeal mask airway protector is inserted along the palatopharyngeal curve, and the cuff is inflated.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jin-Young Hwang, M.D., Ph.D. · SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-05-01
Primary Completion
2018-01-19
Completion
2018-01-20

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03078517 on ClinicalTrials.gov