MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Airway Devices in Paediatric Patients With Difficult Airway

NCT06767995 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-01-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of current study was to compare Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) and Glidescope devices in terms of intubation success and duration of intubation in patients under 12 months of age with PRS. In the present study, the investigators found similar initial intubation success rates with Glidescope and FFB. Although further studies are needed to determine the superiority of the two techniques, the investigators believes that advanced airway techniques should be prioritized and can be safely used by reducing the number of interventions.

Conditions

  • Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Interventions

DEVICE

Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy

If Flexible Intubation Video Endoscope® (FIVE) will be used, the appropriate endotracheal tube is loaded into the bronchoscope and made ready. The number of attempts and duration of successful intubation were recorded by a non-blinded research assistant. The stopwatch was started when the FFB started to pass through the patient's mouth/nose, and as soon as the ventilation of the lungs was confirmed by the end tidal carbon dioxide trace, the stopwatch was stopped and this time was recorded as the successful intubation time. The time between passing FFB through the mouth/nose and obtaining the best glottic view was recorded as the best glottic visualization time. The endotracheal tube passage time was defined as the intubation time minus the best glottic visualization time and recorded. Complications during the procedure were recorded.

DEVICE

Glidescope

If GlideScope® Titanium is to be used, a 50-60° angle is applied with the appropriate stylet, and the appropriate one from 3 pediatric blade sizes is selected according to the clinical experience of the relevant practitioner. The number of attempts and duration of successful intubation were recorded by a non-blinded research assistant. The stopwatch was started as soon as the videolaryngoscope started to pass through the patient's mouth, and the stopwatch was stopped as soon as the ventilation of the lungs was confirmed by the end tidal carbon dioxide trace, and this time was recorded as the successful intubation time. The time between passing the videolaryngoscope through the mouth/nose and obtaining the best glottic view was recorded as the best glottic visualization time. Endotracheal tube transit time was defined as intubation time minus best glottic visualization time and recorded. Complications during the procedure were recorded.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hacettepe University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Day
Max Age
12 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-03-01
Primary Completion
2023-12-31
Completion
2023-12-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06767995 on ClinicalTrials.gov