Evaluation of the Success Rate of Prefabricated Versus Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainers in Children With Prematurely Lost First Primary Molars
NCT06558812 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2024-08-19
Summary
To assess the clinical efficacy of prefabricated space maintainers compared to conventional ones, focusing on preserving the integrity of each component of bands and loops, avoidance of soft tissue impingement as well as preservation of arch dimensions.
Conditions
- Premature Tooth Exfoliation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
prefabricated space maintainer
i. Prefabricated band will be selected for the abutment tooth by measuring the mesiodistal diameter of the abutment tooth with a caliper and will be adjusted with the internal diameter of the prefabricated band. ii. The loop will be selected based on the available mesiodistal space and buccolingual width of the abutment tooth, excessive length with be cut by cutting plier and will then place inside the band's tube by using a HOWE pliers. iii. Cotton roll isolation will use, then will be cemented with glass ionomer,
- DEVICE
-
conventional space maintainer
i. A full arch Impressions will be taken with alginate material. ii. Impressions will be poured up using dental stone within 30 min of the impression taking. iii. The children will be given an appointment for space maintainer insertion. iv. In the second visit , Cotton roll isolation will use, cementation will be performed with glass ionomer .
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dina Yousry El Kharadly, Lecturer · October 6 University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 4 Years
- Max Age
- 6 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-30
- Completion
- 2025-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Dental and Skeletal Effect of TPA and Nance as a Space Maintainers in Children: A Prospective Clinical Trial
NCT05896618 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Lingual Retainer Between Two Types of Light Cured Resin Composite
NCT05660668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics During Maxillary En-masse Retraction in Adult Patients
NCT03261024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance
NCT05433051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
NCT06507319 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Anchorage Loss During En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
NCT04902456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction
NCT05150665 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compartive Evalution of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Power Chain Versus Burstone T-loop
NCT05882526 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Rate of En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
NCT04902430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
NCT05542745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Fixed and Removable Space Maintainers on Periodontal Health and DMFT/Dft Values
NCT03608345 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
White Spot Lesions Development in Mixed Dentition Patients
NCT06798870 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Maxillary Third Molar Extraction vs. Non-extraction on Distalization of First Molars in a Group of Adolescent Patients
NCT05647720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Double-slot Brackets Versus Single-slot Brackets on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT06481761 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Trial of Custom-Made Titanium Plates Versus 3D Lambda Plates for Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures
NCT07231055 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Sliding Jigs vs Retraction Hooks for Maxillary Dentition Distalization Using IZC Miniscrews"
NCT07307209 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Dentoskeletal Changes Associated With a Modified Twin Block Appliance
NCT06589206 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular First Molar Distalization
NCT04229797 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of 3D Printed Modified Twin Block for Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Females
NCT04028661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA