Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction

NCT05150665 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2021-12-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There's a scarcity in literature concerning mini-esthetics specially maxillary gingival display changes following en-masse retraction and two-step retraction. The purpose of this study is to determine, In orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which technique of retraction will result in better esthetics upon smiling following en-masse retraction or two step retraction mechanics.

Conditions

  • Bimaxillary Protrusion

Interventions

PROCEDURE

En-masse retraction

Power chain and Crimpable hook for En-Masse Retraction Retraction will start on a 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 200 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the miniscrew

PROCEDURE

Two step Retraction

Retraction of canine started on a 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 150 g per side)followed by anterior teeth retraction on 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 160 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the mini-screw.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Future University in Egypt

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yehya mostafa, Professor and chairman · Future University in Egypt

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
24 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-10-29
Primary Completion
2021-12-28
Completion
2021-12-28

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05150665 on ClinicalTrials.gov