Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction Systems

NCT06496906 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 116

Last updated 2024-07-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the vertical extraction system Benex and Physics forceps with the conventional extraction tools (extraction forceps and elevators) in the early wound healing period after tooth extraction, as means for minimally invasive tooth extraction.

All patients aged 18 years and over who require closed tooth extraction with good oral hygiene were eligible for participation.

Participants were randomly allocated to tooth extraction with either Benex, Physics forceps or conventional extraction tools using box randomization. Patients are followed up during the recovery period to assess pain and early wound healing, while at the time of extraction, success and buccal cortical plate fracture were evaluated.

Conditions

  • Tooth Extraction Status Nos

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Tooth extraction

A regular closed tooth extraction was performed with the different devices from each arm.

DEVICE

Benex

Benex was used to perform the intervention.

DEVICE

Physics Forceps

Physics forceps were used to perform the intervention.

DEVICE

Conventional Extraction Forceps

Conventional Extraction Forceps were used to perform the intervention.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Plovdiv Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-01
Primary Completion
2023-01-01
Completion
2023-01-01

Countries

  • Bulgaria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06496906 on ClinicalTrials.gov