Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction Systems
NCT06496906 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 116
Last updated 2024-07-11
Summary
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the vertical extraction system Benex and Physics forceps with the conventional extraction tools (extraction forceps and elevators) in the early wound healing period after tooth extraction, as means for minimally invasive tooth extraction.
All patients aged 18 years and over who require closed tooth extraction with good oral hygiene were eligible for participation.
Participants were randomly allocated to tooth extraction with either Benex, Physics forceps or conventional extraction tools using box randomization. Patients are followed up during the recovery period to assess pain and early wound healing, while at the time of extraction, success and buccal cortical plate fracture were evaluated.
Conditions
- Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Tooth extraction
A regular closed tooth extraction was performed with the different devices from each arm.
- DEVICE
-
Benex
Benex was used to perform the intervention.
- DEVICE
-
Physics Forceps
Physics forceps were used to perform the intervention.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Extraction Forceps
Conventional Extraction Forceps were used to perform the intervention.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Plovdiv Medical University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-01-01
- Completion
- 2023-01-01
Countries
- Bulgaria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Piezocision Versus Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin During Orthodontic Canine Retraction Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT07239024 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Extraction Space Consumption and Overjet Reduction After Maxillary Anterior Enmasse Retraction in Orthodontics
NCT06823986 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Rate of En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
NCT04902430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Friction or Frictionless: What is the Most Effective Method for Retracting Anterior Teeth?
NCT06928896 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Shock Waves on Tooth Movement and Miniscrew Stability
NCT01695928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Histological Change of The Dentinal-Pulp Complex and Root Resorption
NCT01642693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Incisors' Position Following Anterior Segment Retraction
NCT04878939 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Pain and Discomfort in Two Acceleration Methods of Canine Retraction
NCT05265416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Teeth Decrowding With and Without Fixed Appliances
NCT06416189 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Evaluation in Alveolar Preservation Using Platelet-rich Fibrin. Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06900036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Extrusion of High Risk Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
NCT06538688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Outcomes After Receiving Conventional Clasp or Precision Attachment Removable Partial Dentures.
NCT02924142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Statically Determinate Force System in Closure of Anterior Open Bite in Adults.
NCT04901221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT05656898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional and 3D-printed Surgical Obturators for Maxillary Defects
NCT07079163 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Morphology After En-masse Retraction in Bimaxillary Protrusion Patients
NCT06197880 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-centered Outcomes During Using Self-ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision vs Traditional Brackets
NCT05416242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines
NCT03535285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Photobiomodulation and Root Resorption
NCT04044989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Photobiomodulation Applications
NCT04022252 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication With Customized Orthodontic Treatment in Adults
NCT03406130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary Expansion: Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander
NCT05135962 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Injectable PRF Vs LLL on Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT06520761 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA