A Randomized Controlled Trial of Modified Ischial Spinous Fascia Fixation and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418451 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 370
Last updated 2024-05-17
Summary
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most common benign gynecological disorders in middle-aged and elderly women, and it has a significant negative impact on women's social, physical, and psychological health. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is one of the main surgical procedures for reconstructing pelvic floor defects. In previous studies, the ischial spine fascia fixation (ISFF) technique developed by our team has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to SSLF. However, both procedures have inadequate support for the anterior vaginal wall. Therefore, based on the traditional ISFF, we fix the anterior vaginal wall to the ipsilateral ischial spine fascia to enhance support for the anterior vaginal wall. This modified procedure is called modified ISFF. This trial aims to compare the subjective and objective therapeutic effects, recurrence rates, quality of life, perioperative parameters, and complications of modified ISFF and SSLF in the treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse of degrees II-IV.
Methods: This trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The primary outcome measure is the composite surgical success rate at one-year follow-up, defined as the absence of subjective vaginal bulge symptoms, no need for retreatment, and absence of POP-Q points at or beyond the hymen or vaginal introitus, i.e., Aa, Ba, C, Ap, Bp all \< 0 cm. The secondary outcomes include anatomical outcomes of each vaginal segment based on the POP-Q score, subjective improvement in quality of life evaluated by questionnaires (PFIQ-7, PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and PGI-I), perioperative parameters (operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain VAS score, hospital costs), and complications. Data analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on a composite success rate of 88% and a non-inferiority margin of -10% (one-sided α = 0.025, β = 0.2), 370 patients will be recruited from 9 centers, including a 10% dropout rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether modified ISFF is non-inferior to SSLF in terms of clinical efficacy and complications.
Discussion: This multicenter non-inferiority trial will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of modified ISFF compared to SSLF in symptomatic patients with degrees II-IV uterovaginal prolapse. If modified ISFF is proven to be non-inferior to SSLF, it would be a preferable alternative for patients with a shorter vaginal length and those who have difficulties with SSLF due to anatomical factors.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
sacrospinous ligament fixation (SLFF)
SSLF is a surgical procedure used to treat vaginal apex prolapse by fixing the vaginal apex to the right sacrospinous ligament. The procedure involves marking and incising the posterior vaginal wall, dissecting the vaginal rectal space, and placing sutures on the outer one-third of the ligament. These sutures connect the vaginal apex to the attachment point of the right uterosacral ligament. Anterior/posterior vaginal wall repair procedures can be performed if needed, without using implant materials. SSLF provides enhanced support for the vaginal apex.
- PROCEDURE
-
modified ischial spinous fascia fixation (modified ISFF)
The modified ISFF procedure involves making a midline incision along the posterior fornix of the vagina, exposing the ischial spine fascia. Two sutures are placed around the ischial spine and passed through the mucosa of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, lifting the vaginal apex and anterior wall towards the spine. The procedure also allows for additional anterior/posterior vaginal wall repair if necessary, without using implant materials.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Lan Zhu
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lan Zhu, MD · Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2026-11-30
- Completion
- 2027-11-30
More Related Trials
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
NCT03283124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for Transvaginal Self-cut Mesh vs Mesh-kit for Severe POP
NCT03849157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of Sacrospinous Fixation and V-notes Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT06307873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
NCT05422209 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair
NCT00153231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Long-term Success Rate of Transvaginal Mesh for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Extended RCT Study
NCT05938881 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
NCT02536001 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Study on the Correction of Prolapse Via Laparoscopy
NCT06815731 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Axis(TM) Solvent-dehydrate Dermal Allograft in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT06263985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
National,Multicentric Randomised Study of the Correction of Genital Prolapse With Fascial Repair or Mesh-Prolift
NCT00771225 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Vaginal Axis on MRI in Alternative Apical Prolapse Surgeries to Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06072456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA