Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
NCT03283124 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 312
Last updated 2019-03-05
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse(POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on woman's quality of life. Transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our preliminary trial showed that the use of self-tailored mesh had good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. The trial is designed to compare self-tailored titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with mesh-kit in the treatment of POP stage III-IV in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effective .
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
pelvic floor reconstructive surgery
transvaginal mesh implantation for pelvic organ prolapse
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Shanghai Medstron Medical Co.Ltd
collaborator UNKNOWN -
LinkDoc Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
collaborator OTHER -
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lan Zhu · Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-12
- Primary Completion
- 2020-01-12
- Completion
- 2022-01-12
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Transvaginal Mesh
NCT00402844 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT00153257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Performance Analysis of the Exair(TM) Prolapse Repair System in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03271294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acellular Collagen Biomesh (Pelvisoft) to Polypropylene Mesh(Pelvitex) for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT00564083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Calistar S for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT03821142 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients
NCT02935803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Splentis for the Treatment of Primary Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05042453 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
NCT02536001 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA