MedTrace Logo

Laryngoscopy and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

NCT06349005 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112

Last updated 2025-05-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, the purpose is to compare Macintosh laryngoscope, EzVision® video laryngoscope, McGrath® video laryngoscope and Storz® video laryngoscope in terms of hemodynamic response associated with intubation in adult patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (CABG).

Conditions

  • Videolaryngoscopy

Interventions

OTHER

Tracheal intubation using Storz VL

Video-assisted intubation technique using Storz VL

OTHER

Tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscopy

Traditional intubation technique using Macintosh laryngoscopy

OTHER

Tracheal intubation using MacGrath VL

Video-assisted intubation technique using MacGrath VL

OTHER

Tracheal intubation using EzVision VL

Video-assisted intubation technique using EzVision VL

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Konya Meram State Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-01-12
Primary Completion
2025-05-28
Completion
2025-05-28

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06349005 on ClinicalTrials.gov