Evaluation of the Safety of Inhaled Sedation With Isoflurane in Head Trauma Patients

NCT06311604 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-07-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Intensive care management of patient with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) includes deep and prolonged sedation with intravenous hypnotics (propofol, midazolam, ketamine) in combination with opioids to prevent and/or treat episodes of intracranial hypertension. However, some patients may develop tachyphylaxis with a gradual increase of administered intravenous hypnotics and opioids to maintain the same level of sedation. This situation leads to a failure in controlling intracranial pressure (ICP) and/or to the risk of adverse effects due to high-dose sedatives: haemodynamic instability, prolonged mechanical ventilation, neuromyopathy, delirium, withdrawal syndrome.

Halogenated agents (Isoflurane, Sevoflurane) are a class of hypnotics routinely used in the operating room. However, doses used in surgical patients (\> 1 Minimal Alveolar Concentration, MAC) are not suitable in neuro-intensive care unit (ICU) patients at risk of intracranial hypertension because of the cerebral vasodilator effects of halogenated agents at this dosage, hence the risk of high ICP and compromised cerebral perfusion pressure.

The use of halogenated agents has been recently possible in the ICU through dedicated medical devices (Sedaconda ACD, Mirus). Recommended dosage are lower in the ICU, i.e. 0.3-0.7 MAC, because of their association with intravenous hypnotics and the absence of surgical stimuli. Several clinical studies in general ICUs showed improved sedation quality, reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, faster arousal and shorter extubation time, and lower costs in halogenated group compared with control group receiving midazolam or propofol. At low doses, the effects on ICP and intracerebral haemodynamics of halogenated agents are minor according to the available literature. In addition, beneficial effects were found on cerebral ischaemic volume in animal models treated with halogenated agents. However, there is a need to explore the benefit-risk ratio of the use of halogenated agents in the severe TBI population.

The investigator hypothesise that 0.7 MAC Isoflurane can be administered in this population without deleterious effect on ICP.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

Isoflurane

Inclusions will have 4 phases according to gradual increased doses of isoflurane: Phase 1: Inclusion of 3 patients with 0.3 MAC isoflurane. In the absence of an increase of ICP \> 20% from baseline, inhaled sedation is maintained for 24 hours until the primary endpoint is assessed. If there one patient who does not tolerate this threshold, three additional patients will be included in this phase. A maximum of one treatment failure (see definition below) is tolerated in the phase 1 Phase 2: Inclusion of 3 additional patients with isoflurane dosage of 0.5 MAC under the same conditions as phase 1. Phase 3: Inclusion of 3 additional patients with isoflurane dosage of 0.7 MAC under the same conditions as phases 1 and 2. Phase 4: Inclusion of 12-15 additional patients will be included at the 0.7 MAC dose, to have 18 patients exposed to 0.7 MAC isoflurane.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Grenoble

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • barthélémy BERTRAND, MD · University Hospital, Grenoble

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-06-20
Primary Completion
2026-06-20
Completion
2027-03-20

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06311604 on ClinicalTrials.gov