Enteral Versus Intravenous Sedation in Critically Ill High-risk ICU Patients

NCT01360346 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2012-04-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Recent studies suggest the employment of 'conscious' sedation (1) for critically high - risk patients (2), showing more efficacy then deep sedation (3). The investigators want to compare intravenous injection versus enteral sedative drugs administration, purposing to maintain a 'conscious' sedation level compatibly with the needed cares, invasive procedures, and medical and nursing surveillance.

Conditions

  • Critical Illness
  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Enteral Sedation (EN)

Intravenous propofol or midazolam administration at the ICU admission and stopped within 48h. Melatonin by enteral route (3mg x 2/die) from admission to discharge. Hydroxyzine by enteral route from ICU admission (600mg/die), decreased and stopped as soon as possible. Lorazepam supplementation (maximum 16mg/die) if hydroxyzine is inadequate.

PROCEDURE

Control group: Intravenous Sedation (IV)

Propofol or midazolam from ICU admission to discharge at the compatible lowest level with harsh ICU environment.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ospedale San Paolo

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mangiagalli e Regina Elena

    collaborator OTHER
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo di Monza

    collaborator OTHER
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda Cà Granda

    collaborator OTHER
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico

    collaborator OTHER
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia

    collaborator OTHER
  • San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ospedale S. Giovanni Bosco

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ospedale Cardinal Massaia

    collaborator OTHER
  • Azienda Ospedaliera, Ospedale Civile di Legnano

    collaborator OTHER
  • Nuovo Ospedale Civile S.Agostino Estense

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Milan

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Iapichino Gaetano, MD · University of Milan

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-01-31
Primary Completion
2012-10-31
Completion
2012-12-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01360346 on ClinicalTrials.gov