Etomidate Versus Propofol in CABG Surgery
NCT06068764 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300
Last updated 2023-12-28
Summary
The objective of this single-blinded randomized controlled interventional clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and long-term safety of etomidate compared to propofol as an anesthesia induction agent in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether patients receiving etomidate or propofol exhibit similar requirements for vasopressor or ionotropic agents during both the intraoperative and postoperative periods.
To achieve this goal, participants who are scheduled for CABG surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either etomidate or propofol as the principal hypnotic agent. The researchers will then compare the effects of these two anesthesia induction agents on various factors, including the need for hemodynamic support, hemodynamic stability, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and overall hospital length of stay. Additionally, they will assess whether there are disparities in mortality rates and readmission rates within a 6-month timeframe after the surgery.
By comparing the outcomes between the two groups, the study aims to provide valuable insights into the potential differences in vasopressor or ionotropic agent requirements between etomidate and propofol. This information can help inform clinical decision-making and potentially optimize anesthesia management strategies for patients undergoing CABG surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Etomidate
The type of general anesthesia induction agent for CABG surgery
- DRUG
-
Propofol
The type of general anesthesia induction agent for CABG surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hartford Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Joseph Hinchey, MD · Hartford Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-12-05
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-08-31
- FDA Drug
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of RBT-1 on Reducing the Risk of Post-Operative Complications in Subjects Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
NCT06021457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Amiodarone for the Prevention of Reperfusion Ventricular Fibrillation
NCT00587483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study to Evaluate Nesiritide in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery A014 / NAPA
NCT00653042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Amobarbital and Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT06757868 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Phase III Study Comparing Two Methods of Cardioplegia in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT01444235 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Efficacy of Different Perioperative Statin Regimens on the Protection Against Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Major Adverse Cardio-cerebral Events
NCT02706860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
CABG Combined Pedicled Omentum Wrapped Autologous Atrial Tissue Patch Cardiomyoplasty for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00972114 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Anesthesia Standard Operating Procedure During On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
NCT05514652 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Neuroaxial Prophylaxis for CABG
NCT04244435 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution Versus Blood Cardioplegia in CABG
NCT04203680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Open Heart Surgery Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT05011617 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
NCT01500369 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of stAndard and Hybrid Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of proximaL Aortic dissEctions
NCT03711136 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Valdecoxib Plus Parecoxib Versus Valdecoxib Plus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT00636064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Study
NCT00000463 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Preparation of Patients for Cardiac Surgery
NCT00906646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prevention of Post-OP AFib Using Combination of CardiaMend and Amiodarone
NCT05681182 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Combined Use of a Novel Cardioplegic Formula With Myocardial Protection System (MPS)® Versus Cardioplexol ® in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Using MiECC;
NCT03612388 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing On-pump CABG
NCT03905759 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Role of Calcium Chloride Injection in Alleviating Atrial Fibrillation Post CABG
NCT06378021 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Nitrite Mediated Cardioprotection During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT01098409 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effect of Oral Isosorbide Mononitrate Plus Amlodipine Antispasm Therapy on Outcomes of Radial Artery Grafts After CABG
NCT06730945 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Improving Outcomes and Quality of Life After CABG
NCT00005690 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combined Use of a Novel Cardioplegic Formula With MPS® Versus Cardioplexol ® in Urgent Isolated CABG Using MiECC in Patients With Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT04309994 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Fibrinogen and Bleeding After Cardiac Surgery
NCT00968045 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2