MedTrace Logo

LVMR Versus PSR for External FTRPin Elderly Patients

NCT05915936 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 330

Last updated 2023-06-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In frail patients with external full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP), the exact postoperative recurrence and functional result outcomes difference between Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and perineal stapler resection (PSR) have not been investigated, leading to ineffective treatment.

Objectives: Evaluating the efficacy of PSR versus LVMR for treating external FTRP in the elderly.

Design: This was a retrospective study that involved multiple centers. Settings: This study was conducted in the colorectal surgical units of our Universities' Hospitals Patients: 330 elderly patients divided into LVMR group (250), and PSR (80) between April 2012 and April 2019. Before and after surgery, patients were evaluated using the Wexner Incontinence Scale, the Altomare Constipation Scale, and the patient's satisfaction.

Main outcomes measurement: The primary outcome was the recurrence rate and risk factors of FTRP. Secondary outcomes were postoperative incontinence and constipation and patients' satisfaction.

Conditions

  • Rectal Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

LVMR

laoparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy

PROCEDURE

PSR

perineal stapler resection

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zagazig University

    lead OTHER_GOV

Eligibility

Min Age
61 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-04-01
Primary Completion
2019-04-01
Completion
2023-04-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05915936 on ClinicalTrials.gov