Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 220
Last updated 2021-06-29
Summary
the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and long term outcomes of laser hemorroidoplasty versus conventional milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy in II-III degree hemorroidal disease.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
LHP
A skin microincision of 3 mm was made about 1 to 1.5 cm of distance from the anal verge at the base of each hemorrhoidal node. The probe (1.85 mm of diameter) was driven through the incision in the submucosal tissue until reaching the area underneath the distal rectal mucosa. Then, ten to twelve effective pulses (adjusted to respective node dimensions), 8 watt per 3 seconds each, of approximately 24 Joule using a 1470-nm diode laser generator (LEONARDO® DUAL 45 Biolitec® Jena, Germany) were fired. Half of them were fired in the submucosal tissue, the others in the intra-nodal compartment determining the shrinkage of the hemorrhoidal piles. The anal wounds were left open. At the end of the procedure an anal tampon was positioned.
- PROCEDURE
-
MM
The hemorrhoidectomy was performed by radiofrequency (LigaSure TM Small Jaw® Covidien®, Colorado, USA) or ultrasound (Focus® Ultracision® harmonic scalpel; Ethicon Endo-Surgery®, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio). The anodermal wedge was incised, eventually removing external fibrosis and/or skin tags when present. Upward dissection started at this level with en-bloc excision of mucosal and submucosal layers from the underlying internal anal sphincter up to the anorectal ring. A compressive haemostatic sponge was left in place for 12-24 hours.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2018-12-31
- Completion
- 2020-12-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy
NCT01263431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Reproducibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
NCT07171294 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Hemorrhoidectomy With or Without Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Management of Patients With Hemorrhoids
NCT06884774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Technique LHP (Laser HemorrhoidoPlasty) in Haemorrhoidal Prolapse Mini Invasive Surgery
NCT03322527 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
LaseRF Trial: Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04981600 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Milligan-Morgan Versus Dearterialization With Mucopexy
NCT04863963 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT05959577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade II-III Internal Hemorrhoids: a Multicenter, Non-randomized Controlled Study
NCT06794151 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
NCT00617448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoidectomy Only Versus Hemorrhoidectomy With Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
NCT06588374 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Polidocanol Foam VS Artery Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04675177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique Versus Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound for Hemorrhoids
NCT03298997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Topical Medical Device in Wound Healing and Symptom Relief in the Postoperative Period of Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy (The Emor Study)
NCT06872151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy of Rectal Infiltration of Exparel for Analgesic Benefit Following Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT02104414 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Trial :Hemorrhoidal Pedicle Ligation vs Laser vs Open Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT03757728 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation Versus Stapler Haemorrhoidopexy
NCT01615575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Napoleon Trial: Optimal Treatment for Recurrent Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04101773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial
NCT02216305 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Haemorrhoidectomy by Ligasure and Conventional Surgery
NCT03265990 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoid Radiofrequency
NCT06079892 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Hemorrhoid Artery LigatioN Without Doppler Trial
NCT04119401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stapled Anopexy Versus Closed Haemorrhoidectomy for Haemorrhoids
NCT00397137 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study About Patient Comfort and Long-term Outcome After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01533363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Transarterial Coil Embolization of the Superior Rectal Arteries for Treatment of Stage II Hemorrhoids
NCT03805087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Hemorrohoidectomy Vs Transanal Hemorrhoidal Desarterialization in Hemorrhoids Grade III: The Effect on Symptoms
NCT06420986 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA