An International Double Cohort Study to Compare Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy With Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy
NCT01595412 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2
Last updated 2017-10-24
Summary
Background:
Rectal prolapse (RP) is the descent of the upper rectum and is a common problem in the western world. Surgery is the only definite treatment and is preferably performed minimally invasive. High-level prospective studies on treatment strategies for RP currently are lacking and, thus, no consensus exist regarding the optimal treatment for patients with RP. Furthermore, remarkable transatlantic differences exist, as in Europe, laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) is regarded the treatment of choice, while in the USA Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy (LRR) remains the golden standard.
Objective:
To determine the optimal minimally invasive surgical treatment for patients with RP.
Design:
International, prospective, comparative double cohort study. The first cohort will consist of 120 European patients with a RP and will be treated with LVR. Centres in The Netherlands, Belgium and the UK are enlisted for participation. The second cohort will consist of 120 American patients with a RP, treated with LRR. Several US centres are enlisted. Preoperative work-up consists of radiological imaging and standardised questionnaires. Follow-up (FU) is set on two years. During FU, pre-operative imaging and questionnaires will be repeated.
Primary \& secondary outcomes:
Primary endpoint will be improvement on the Gastro-Intestinal-Quality-of-Life-Index (GIQLI). Secondary endpoints will be generic Quality-of-Life, functional results, morbidity, mortality, recurrences and cost-effectiveness.
Time frame:
Study and inclusion start will be on January the 1st, 2011 and will take approximately 18-24 months. Therefore, total study duration will be 42-48 months.
Conditions
- Rectal Prolapse
- Procidentia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy
laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with suture rectopexy
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy
laparoscopic ventral rectopexy with mesh
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Cleveland Clinic
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Steven D Wexner, MD · Cleveland Clinic Floria
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-10-31
- Completion
- 2017-10-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Pexy Versus Non-pexy for Full Thickness Rectal Prolapse
NCT01022034 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Endoluminal and Needlescopic Assisted Repair of Rectal Prolapse
NCT01980043 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT01899209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for the Treatment of Obstructive Defecation Syndrome
NCT06294470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrence and Bowel Function After Laparoscopic Vaginorectopexy, a Modified Anterior Rectopexy
NCT06330857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Delorme Operation With or Without Postanal Repair in Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT01656369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrence of Dyschezia in Rectal Prolapse, Rectocele and Elytrocele
NCT04627610 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Rectal Prolapse With ODS. STARR vs LVR.
NCT04892108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Transvaginal Repair for Rectocele
NCT03944720 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Coring Out Fistulectomy With Closure of Internal Sphincter Opening Versus Lay Open Fistulotomy and Primary Sphincter Repair in Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula
NCT06478615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT00830661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Rectourethral Fistulas Surgery With Gracilis Flap Interposition After Localized Prostatic Cancer Treatment.
NCT04654715 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children
NCT04117633 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transvaginal Versus Transperineal Repair of Rectocele
NCT03801291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Swedish Rectal Prolapse Trial
NCT04893642 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Frailty Increase Rectal Prolapse Recurrence
NCT07230275 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Anal Fistula Plug Versus Endorectal Advancement Flap
NCT01931371 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fecal Incontinence and Rectal Static Disorder
NCT04566640 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) Surgery in Refractory Constipation Associated With Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS)
NCT00256984 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Vertical Versus Horizontal Plicataion in Transperienal Repair of Rectocele
NCT04502953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Pessary Post Vaginal Prolapse Repair, for One Month, to Reduce the Recurrence Rate of Prolapse
NCT03056586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Fissurectomy to Fissurectomy With Anoplasty
NCT04911023 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Modified Perineal Linear Stapler Resection for External Rectal Prolapse: a Novel Approach
NCT04184310 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Native Tissue Repair With Surgical Pelvic Organ Pessary - an RCT
NCT02808377 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
STARR Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using Elevate: Effects on Defecatory Function
NCT01257659 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA