3D vs 2D-laparoscopy for Rectocele and Rectal Prolapse Correction: a Prospective, Randomized, Single Center Study

NCT04817150 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2021-04-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim is to compare proximate and remote results of 3D and conventional 2D laparoscopic interventions in terms of efficacy and safety in treatment of symptomatic rectocele and rectal prolapse.

This is a prospective randomized comparative study in parallel groups conducted in single Colorectal unit. Inclusion criteria: female patients with stage 3 rectocele (3-4 POP-Q \[pelvic organ prolapse quantification\] grade) and/or full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Intervention - laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. The primary outcome is objective cure rate of pelvic prolapse. Secondary outcomes include obstructive defecation and incontinence symptoms according to Wexner and Cleveland Clinic scales, and satisfaction according to Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Operative times, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postop pain severity, urinary incontinence, as well as surgical and mesh complications are also assessed.

The specific point of interest in this study is surgeon's tiredness after the operation assessed with Profile of Mood States questionnaire.

Conditions

  • Rectocele; Female
  • Rectocele and Incomplete Uterine Prolapse
  • Rectocele and Complete Uterovaginal Prolapse
  • Rectal Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy

Conventional laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, as first described by D'Hoore

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Alexander Khitaryan

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-03-10
Primary Completion
2022-06-30
Completion
2022-07-31

Countries

  • Russia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04817150 on ClinicalTrials.gov