Posterior Versus Lateral Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy for the Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT06559085 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2024-08-19
Summary
Aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of two different methods of mesh placement during laparoscopic rectopexy for the management of complete rectal prolapse lateral versus posterior mesh rectopexy
Conditions
- Posterior Laparoscopic
- Lateral Laparoscopic
- Rectopexy
- Complete Rectal Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laproscopic posterior mesh rectopexy (Wells or LPMR)
After complete rectal mobilization, a mesh is inserted between the sacrum and the posterior rectum, sutured into the rectum, and fixed to the promontory. The mortality rates ranged from 0% to 1.2%, and recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 11% There was an overall improvement in continence (74%-100%), with conflicting results regarding constipation. New-onset constipation in 5% to 44% of patients was reported
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic lateral mesh rectopexy (Orr-Loygue)
This procedure involves complete mobilization of the rectum with two mesh strips sutured laterally to the rectal wall on both sides, and they were suspended to the promontory. There are several studies on this procedure using a laparoscopic approach. Lechaux et al. performed laparoscopic Orr-Loygue rectopexy in 35 patients. Incontinence improved in 27% of patients, and constipation improved in 19% but worsened in 27%. The recurrence rate was 3% (1/35) after a mean follow-up of 36 months. A study on 46 patients with laparoscopic Orr-Loygue procedure with posterior mobilization found a significant reduction in incontinence score after 1 year, but there were no changes in the use of laxatives. The recurrence rate was 4% after a median follow-up of 1.5 years
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-08-15
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children
NCT04117633 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LVMR Versus PSR for External FTRPin Elderly Patients
NCT05915936 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Combined With or Without Stapled Trans-anal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT03060330 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele
NCT02659176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of the House Advancement Flap, Rhomboid Flap, and Y-V Anoplasty
NCT00883571 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rerouting Seton Versus LIFT for Complex Anal Fistula
NCT04616911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Perineal Linear Stapler Resection for External Rectal Prolapse: a Novel Approach
NCT04184310 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anoplasty for Post Hemorroidectomy Anal Stenosis : Diamond Versus V-Y Flap Techniques
NCT05389475 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Coring Out Fistulectomy With Closure of Internal Sphincter Opening Versus Lay Open Fistulotomy and Primary Sphincter Repair in Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula
NCT06478615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rectal Prolapse With ODS. STARR vs LVR.
NCT04892108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT00830661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Haemorrhoidectomy by Ligasure and Conventional Surgery
NCT03265990 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
STARR Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using Elevate: Effects on Defecatory Function
NCT01257659 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Evaluating the Clinical Outcome of a Modified d'Hoore Technique for Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
NCT04564677 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Recurrence of Dyschezia in Rectal Prolapse, Rectocele and Elytrocele
NCT04627610 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transvaginal Versus Transperineal Repair of Rectocele
NCT03801291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Performance Evaluation of a Biological Matrix Used for Rectal Prolapse Repair by Ventral Rectopexy
NCT04130555 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pexy Versus Non-pexy for Full Thickness Rectal Prolapse
NCT01022034 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hemorrhoidectomy Only Versus Hemorrhoidectomy With Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
NCT06588374 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
FOAM: Functional Outcome After Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
NCT06455501 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Vertical Versus Horizontal Plicataion in Transperienal Repair of Rectocele
NCT04502953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoidectomy With or Without Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Management of Patients With Hemorrhoids
NCT06884774 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preliminary Results of Laparoscopic Assisted Transanal Proximal Rectosigmoidectomy Combined With Malone Antegrade Continence Enema for the Management of Intractable Functional Constipation in Children
NCT07180680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy in Second and Third Degree Piles
NCT05770141 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Sigmoid Fixation For Management Of Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus
NCT07155304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA