Posterior Versus Lateral Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy for the Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse

NCT06559085 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-08-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of two different methods of mesh placement during laparoscopic rectopexy for the management of complete rectal prolapse lateral versus posterior mesh rectopexy

Conditions

  • Posterior Laparoscopic
  • Lateral Laparoscopic
  • Rectopexy
  • Complete Rectal Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laproscopic posterior mesh rectopexy (Wells or LPMR)

After complete rectal mobilization, a mesh is inserted between the sacrum and the posterior rectum, sutured into the rectum, and fixed to the promontory. The mortality rates ranged from 0% to 1.2%, and recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 11% There was an overall improvement in continence (74%-100%), with conflicting results regarding constipation. New-onset constipation in 5% to 44% of patients was reported

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic lateral mesh rectopexy (Orr-Loygue)

This procedure involves complete mobilization of the rectum with two mesh strips sutured laterally to the rectal wall on both sides, and they were suspended to the promontory. There are several studies on this procedure using a laparoscopic approach. Lechaux et al. performed laparoscopic Orr-Loygue rectopexy in 35 patients. Incontinence improved in 27% of patients, and constipation improved in 19% but worsened in 27%. The recurrence rate was 3% (1/35) after a mean follow-up of 36 months. A study on 46 patients with laparoscopic Orr-Loygue procedure with posterior mobilization found a significant reduction in incontinence score after 1 year, but there were no changes in the use of laxatives. The recurrence rate was 4% after a median follow-up of 1.5 years

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-08-15
Primary Completion
2026-10-01
Completion
2026-10-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06559085 on ClinicalTrials.gov