Efficacy of Transvaginal Repair for Rectocele
NCT03944720 · Status: TERMINATED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 15
Last updated 2023-09-28
Summary
Patients with rectoceles may present a variety of symptoms such as pelvic pressure, obstructive defecation or discomfort during sexual intercourse. The main symptom of the patient probably ends up conditioning if the patient is referred to a gynaecologist or a colorectal surgeon.
Different surgical techniques have been described to repair the rectocele. The posterior colporrhaphy is the preferred approach for most gynaecologists, while the transanal repair is the most common approach for the majority of colorectal surgeons. However, the small number of prospective studies, the inconsistent inclusion criteria and the variability of the outcome measures make difficult to know what the ideal surgical approach for a rectocele repair would be. Gynaecologists usually do not assess defecatory function before a rectocele repair, and studies focused on obstructive defecation include patients with other co-existing pathologies (rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, enterocele) that may influence the success of the repair. Moreover, functional disorders such as the paradoxical contraction of the external anal sphincter or the puborectalis muscle are not systematically reported. On the other hand, many surgeons have questioned the transvaginal approach because it has been reported that patients may present dyspareunia after the surgery, although it is not systematically evaluated.
The hypothesis of the investigators is that the transvaginal approach for rectocele repair is an effective treatment for symptoms of obstructive defecation and is not associated with sexual dysfunction when the plication of the puborectalis muscle is not performed.
Conditions
- Rectocele
- Surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital Universitari MútuaTerrassa
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Heling HartZiekenhuis Lier
collaborator OTHER -
Hospital Clinico Universitario San Cecilio
collaborator OTHER -
Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-07-15
- Primary Completion
- 2022-12-31
- Completion
- 2022-12-31
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Transvaginal Versus Transperineal Repair of Rectocele
NCT03801291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Combined With or Without Stapled Trans-anal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT03060330 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Results of the Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) Operation Proposed in the Treatment of a Rectocele
NCT05037422 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Breakthrough Improvement Collaborative for Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
NCT05728554 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Recto-Anal-Repair in the Treatment of Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01301209 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Pessary Post Vaginal Prolapse Repair, for One Month, to Reduce the Recurrence Rate of Prolapse
NCT03056586 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT01899209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility and Safety of Additional Injection of Autologous Platelet-rich Stroma to Surgical Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistulas
NCT06798935 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
LVMR Versus PSR for External FTRPin Elderly Patients
NCT05915936 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Versus LIFT-plug Procedure for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT01478139 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacy of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for the Treatment of Obstructive Defecation Syndrome
NCT06294470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pexy Versus Non-pexy for Full Thickness Rectal Prolapse
NCT01022034 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Rectovaginal Fistula Repair
NCT05006586 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Rectal Prolapse With ODS. STARR vs LVR.
NCT04892108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Quality of Global and Sexual Life and Impact of Surgical and Non Surgical Vaginal Aplasia in Patients With a Rokitansky Syndrome
NCT01911884 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol
NCT02113969 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoluminal and Needlescopic Assisted Repair of Rectal Prolapse
NCT01980043 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recto Anal Repair or Milligan Morgans Operation of Grade 3 and 4 Symptomatic Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01038141 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Frailty Increase Rectal Prolapse Recurrence
NCT07230275 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Regenerative Therapy With Autologous Stromal Vascular Fraction Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet-rich Plasma to Treat Complex Perianal Diseases
NCT05709717 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Treatment of Lower Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula: Fistulotomy With Marsupialization vs Open Wound
NCT04722965 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Adipose Tissue Injection for the Treatment of Complex Cryptoglandular Perianal Fistula
NCT04790123 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Perineal Reconstruction Following eLAPE and Simultaneous Stoma Sublay Reinforcement
NCT01670851 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Graft-Augmented Rectocele Repair-A Randomized Surgical Trial
NCT00321867 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Will Cleaning the Bowel With an Enema Before Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Prevent Complications?
NCT00981539 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA