Relapse and Failure Rates Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fixed Retainers
NCT05915273 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 43
Last updated 2023-06-22
Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the differences in relapse and failure rates in patients treated with fixed retainers (FRs) using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing technology, lab-based technique, and chairside method.
Conditions
- Relapse
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing Retainers
Custom-bent fixed retainer wires from an in-office CAD/CAM system with FixR software and the BenderI machine (YOAT Corporation, Lynwood, WA). Dentaflex wires- round, 0.5mm in diameter, three-stranded Stainless Steel (Dentaurum GmbH \& Co., Ispringen, Germany)- were used for the CAD/CAM group
- OTHER
-
Lab-based Retainers
The lab group used the same type of wire as the CAD/CAM group but was manually bent by a lab technician
- OTHER
-
Chairside Retainers
The chairside group used three-stranded Stainless Steel, 0.974mm x 0.402 mm, flexible Ortho-FlexTech wires (Reliance, Itasca, IL)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Nourhan M.Aly
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Giau Tran · Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
-
Ryan Rucker · Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
-
Patrick Foley, PhD · Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
-
Brent Bankhead · Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
-
Samar M Adel, PhD · Alexandria University
-
Ki B Kim · Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 13 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-09-01
- Completion
- 2022-09-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prosthesis and Implant Survival in Immediately Loaded Temporary Full Arch Restorations
NCT03814070 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Chairside CAD/CAM Nano-ceramic Restorations
NCT01464294 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Maintenance and Tissues Conditions of Fixed Screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis Versus Implant-Retained Ball Overdentures
NCT04708132 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Database Study: Survival of Cast Restorations - Restorations Made of Precious Metal vs. Non-precious Metal
NCT06441032 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Prosthetic and Biological Complications of Implant Supported Prostheses
NCT05297253 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Surface Topography and Color Stability of Implant Supported 3D Printed Provisional Restorations
NCT06947070 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic Outcomes of Single Immediate Implant Placement
NCT02435706 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Retention of Upper Complete Denture Base Using Rapid Prototyping Versus a Conventional One
NCT03354715 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Wear and Surface Roughness of Partial Restorations Produced by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Methods: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT07057401 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three Hard Relining Materials in Complete Dentures
NCT02203279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Maintenance and Cost Effectiveness of Cendres Metaux Locator (CM-LOC) Resin Matrix Versus Ball Nylon Matrix Attachment Retaining Single Implant Mandibular Complete Overdentures
NCT02907515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Secondary Telescopic Crowns on Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture.
NCT06637930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-implant Overdentures Retained by the Novaloc Attachment System
NCT03126942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Manually Versus Digitally Fabricated Removable Partial Dentures
NCT01191073 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventionally vs. Digitally Fabricated Complete Dentures: Clinical Treatment Outcome Differences
NCT02521935 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Prefabricated Stainless-Steel Crowns for Intermediate Restoration of Compromised First Permanent Molars
NCT06047925 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Maxillary Implant Overdentures Retained by Bars or Locator
NCT06152432 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacturing Titanium Versus Co/Cr Single Dentures.
NCT03675594 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Versus Late Placement
NCT04741607 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate vs Delayed Placement of Straumann BLX Implants in Molar Extraction Sockets
NCT04327284 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
One-Tooth One-Time (1T1T) A Straightforward Approach to Replace Missing Teeth in the Posterior Region: a Case Series
NCT02898311 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications of Screw Retained Restoration
NCT03674554 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Trial Restoration Matrix Fabrication Methods
NCT06912503 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Retainer All-Ceramic Resin-bonded Fixed Dental Protheses
NCT01411592 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA