Diagnostic Efficacy Of 3 EUS-FNB Techniques
NCT05825729 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 330
Last updated 2023-11-15
Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a widely recognized tool for over 30 years for diagnosing intra-abdominal lesions and gastrointestinal cancers, especially pancreatic neoplasia. In most hospitals, it is the preferred method for sampling using fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or histology needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNB) to obtain cytological and histological material for an anatomopathological diagnosis. It is also recognized by current oncology guidelines.
Numerous factors can affect the efficacy of this technique, such as the needle size, type (cytology or histology), number of passes made on the lesion, the presence or absence of a pathologist in the endoscopy room, the experience of the endoscopist, etc.
Currently, EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB are recommended interchangeably for diagnosis; however, it appears that histology needles (EUS-FNB) allow for greater diagnostic efficacy by obtaining a cellular block with fewer passes, which allows for more advanced anatomopathological analysis (such as immunohistochemistry or molecular analysis).
Regarding the technique for performing the puncture and acquiring the sample, current European guidelines recommend sampling using EUS-FNA or FNB by dry suction with a 10 mL syringe. However, other recognized techniques, such as using a stylet with the "slow-pull" technique (not positioning for or against) or liquid biopsy (which could obtain larger cellular blocks compared to dry puncture), are widely used and could obtain better samples, but there is no clear consensus currently.
Investigators' goal is to conduct a randomized clinical trial of three EUS-FNB techniques (dry puncture vs slow-pull vs wet puncture) used in daily clinical practice to evaluate which of the three techniques has greater efficacy in cytological and pathological diagnosis.
Conditions
- Efficacy, Self
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Dry suction technique (A)
Using a linear echoendoscope, such as Pentax or Olympus, after identifying the lesion and deciding where to perform the EUS-FNB, always checking that there are no vessels on the eco-Doppler that would prevent puncture, a 22G Cook "Echo-Tip Procore" histology needle will be used to perform the following techniques of the described arms. \- Dry suction puncture: Once the lesion is located and punctured, the stylet will be completely removed, and a 10 mL syringe with a vacuum of 10 mL will be attached. In each pass, the needle will be advanced and retracted 20-30 times according to the standard technique. The suction will then be closed, and the needle will be removed. The "fanning" technique will be performed whenever possible.
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Slow-pull technique (B)
Using a linear echoendoscope, such as Pentax or Olympus, after identifying the lesion and deciding where to perform the EUS-FNB, always checking that there are no vessels on the eco-Doppler that would prevent puncture, a 22G Cook "Echo-Tip Procore" histology needle will be used to perform the following techniques of the described arms.
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
Wet suction technique (C)
Using a linear echoendoscope, such as Pentax or Olympus, after identifying the lesion and deciding where to perform the EUS-FNB, always checking that there are no vessels on the eco-Doppler that would prevent puncture, a 22G Cook "Echo-Tip Procore" histology needle will be used to perform the following techniques of the described arms. \- Wet suction technique: Prior to puncture, the stylet should be removed and the needle should be flushed with 1-2 ml of physiological saline and a 10 ml vacuum syringe with 3-5 ml of saline should be attached. In each pass, the needle should be moved forward and backward 20-30 times. Aspiration should be opened as the needle advances and closed as it is withdrawn. Afterwards, the aspiration should be closed and the needle should be removed. The "fanning" technique should be performed whenever possible.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital Universitario Insular Gran Canaria
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guillermo Perez-Aguado, MD · CHUIMI
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-06-27
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-22
- Completion
- 2025-05-22
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Use of FNA and FNB in the Optimization of EUS-assisted Tissue Sampling
NCT02360839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Cellularity Yield of Three Different 22-gauge FNA Needles
NCT01916421 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With a New Core Histology Needle Versus Conventional Fine Needle Aspiration
NCT01774162 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Wet Suction Versus Capillary Techniques for EUS Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy of Solid Lesions
NCT02919553 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multicentered Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial For Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04841616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytopathology vs. EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Alone in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03435588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus Fanning Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA)
NCT01501903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Diagnostic Value of Different EUS-FNA Techniques
NCT03674710 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Wet Suction and Dry Suction Technique in EUS-FNA for the Outcomes in Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03821974 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Real-world Comparison of FNB and FNA in IHC-required Lesions.
NCT05565066 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Trial of EUS-FNA Versus EUS-FNB Using a Novel Core Biopsy Needle
NCT01769248 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Diagnostic Adequacy of 25-gauge Fork-tip, Franseen and Reverse-bevel Type Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Tissue Acquisition
NCT05434247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial With a New Needle Device Comparing Two Needles for EUS_FNA of Solid Lesions.
NCT02246322 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing of Modified Wet Suction Technique and Dry Suction Technique for EUS-FNA of Solid Occupying Lesions
NCT02789371 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration With And Without A Stylet
NCT01213290 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional Needles
NCT01581762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prospective Multi-center, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA on Solid Occupying Lesion
NCT02327065 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Elastography Targeted Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT03210948 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Contrast-enhanced Harmonic and Conventional EUS-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04924725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy (EUS-FNAB) in the Absence of Rapid Onsite Evaluation
NCT02079285 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
EUS-FNB With ROSE Vs. EUS-FNB Without ROSE
NCT03322592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency Study of the EUS-FNA Needles With and Without a Side Port in Pancreatic Masses
NCT01978808 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT01936467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of EUS-Guided 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Versus Fine-needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Neoplasms
NCT01673334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Wet-suction Versus Slow-pull for EUS-FNB of Solid Lesions
NCT04834193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA