A Real-world Comparison of FNB and FNA in IHC-required Lesions.

NCT05565066 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 439

Last updated 2022-12-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needles with side fenestrations are used to collect aspirates for cytology analysis and biopsy samples for histologic analysis. The investigators conducted a large, multicenter study to compare the accuracy of diagnosis via specimens collected with fine-needle biopsy (FNB) versus fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for patients with lesions requiring immunohistochemistry (IHC) pathological diagnosis.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

FNB group

Fine-needle-biopsy (Echotip ProCore Needle)

DEVICE

FNA group

Fine-needle-aspiration (Echotip Needle)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking Union Medical College

    collaborator OTHER
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-12-01
Primary Completion
2022-09-30
Completion
2022-10-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05565066 on ClinicalTrials.gov