Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Contrast-enhanced Harmonic and Conventional EUS-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04924725 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2021-06-14
Summary
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (FNA/B) is used to collect biopsy samples from many organs throughout the digestive tract and is useful in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). The reported diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for SPLs is 85-89.4%, the sensitivity is 82-94.7%, and the specificity is 100%. One randomized controlled trial reported that the fanning technique of FNA was superior to the standard approach because fewer passes were required to establish the diagnosis. However, in many cases, like SPLs with the presence of fibrosis and necrosis background, four or more needle passes are still needed to obtain sufficient biopsy samples. There is a potential risk of tumor seeding associated with multiple needle punctures. Therefore, it is important to minimize the number of needle passes.
Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) using sonazoid (Daiichi-Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) is useful to visualize parenchymal perfusion in the pancreas and characterize of SPLs. Because the necrotic or fibrotic area within the SPLs were appeared as non-enhanced area, CEH-EUS could help us to avoid puncture the non-enhancing area hence increased the diagnostic accuracy. Katana et al. reported that conventional EUS-FNA has lower sensitivity (72.9%) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with non-enhanced areas compared to with enhanced areas (94.3%) on CEH-EUS. Therefore, it would be difficult to obtain sufficient biopsy samples through unenhanced areas of SPLs.
Conditions
- Pancreatic Solid Lesions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy is used to collect biopsy samples from solid pancreatic lesions throughout the digestive tract and is useful in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Taiwan University Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-02-18
- Primary Completion
- 2019-02-18
- Completion
- 2021-01-27
Countries
- Taiwan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Non-hypovascular Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Role of EUS
NCT03738280 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
RCT Comparing Accuracy Among Franseen, Forward-bevel Westcott, and Fork-tip EUS-FNB Needle in Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT07032974 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of EUS-FNA on Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
NCT02041897 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparision of EUS-FNB Techniques for Diagnose of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT05549856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Needle Aspiration Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT01936467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Different Suction Techniques For Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy In Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03849209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Elastography Targeted Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT03210948 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Accurateness of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in the Guidance of EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04148755 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Study FNB, Is It Time To Abandon Cytological Assessment
NCT04165018 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of EUS-guided FNA for Diagnosing Autoimmune Pancreatitis
NCT03241797 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparsion of WT and SNP Techniques of EUS-FNB in Pancreatic Solid Mass (WESP-PSM)
NCT04605042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytopathology vs. EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Alone in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03435588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Connect Your Needle to Your Phone to Increase EUS FNA Diagnostic Yield?
NCT03303352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS FNB Versus FNA With On-Site Cytopathology in Solid Pancreatic Masses
NCT03485924 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Needles (ProCore vs EchoTip) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Mass Under EUS
NCT01479803 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Comparison of Wet Suction and Dry Suction Technique in EUS-FNA for the Outcomes in Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03821974 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique
NCT01923883 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-FNB With ROSE Vs. EUS-FNB Without ROSE
NCT03322592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) With and Without the Use of a Stylet in the Biopsy Needle
NCT01241799 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of EUS-FNB Biopsy Techniques of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04843956 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus Fanning Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA)
NCT01501903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Multi-center, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA on Solid Occupying Lesion
NCT02327065 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT: Difference in Diagnostic Yield Between EUSFNA Needles With and Without a Side Port in Pancreatic Masses
NCT02092519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Olympus EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G in EUS-guided FNB of Solid Pancreatic Masses
NCT02909530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With a New Core Histology Needle Versus Conventional Fine Needle Aspiration
NCT01774162 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA