EUS-FNB With ROSE Vs. EUS-FNB Without ROSE

Summary

Rationale: Rapid on-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytologic specimens acquired with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) represents the most accurate available technique to reach a definitive diagnosis in patients with pancreatic solid masses. Cytologic interpretation, however, requires a high degree of expertise rarely found outside high volume centers and ROSE is not available in many countries. This has created a barrier to the widespread dissemination of EUS in the community and throughout the world, because the lack of cytologic expertise has resulted in a low diagnostic accuracy and, therefore, in a limited perceived utility of EUS. A device that is able to: (i) acquire histologic core biopsy samples usually easier to be interpreted; (ii) be used by most of the endosonographers and not only by the experts; (iii) have a performance at least not inferior to ROSE, will represent a major breakthrough in the field of EUS tissue acquisition. The availability of such needles will determine a shift from cytology to histology that will overcome some of the limitations of cytology and ROSE, thus strongly contributing to the diffusion of EUS throughout the world and in the community.

Objectives: To compare the performance and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) coupled with ROSE with that of EUS-FNB alone using an FNB needle.

Study design: International randomized multicenter trial. Study population: Patients ≥18 years old, referred for EUS-guided tissue sampling of a solid pancreatic mass.

Intervention: EUS-guided tissue acquisition by means of either EUS-FNB with ROSE or EUS-FNB alone, using one of the following FNB needles: Procore 20-gauge, SharkCore 22-gauge or Acquire 22-gauge.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy, measured against the gold standard diagnosis that will be surgical resection specimen or in non-operated patients the results of other diagnostic work-up (other tissue sampling techniques and imaging studies) or the clinical course of the disease. Secondary endpoints include: i) safety; ii) presence of tissue core; iii) feasibility to perform additional immunohistochemical/molecular biology analyses; iv) time of the sampling procedure.

Conditions

• Biopsy, Fine-needle
• Pancreatic Neoplasm

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE)

On-site evaluation of the acquired samples will be performed by pathologist

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Histologic evaluation

Samples collected in the EUS-FNB without ROSE will be processed as histologic samples

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Stefano Francesco Crinò, MD · Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata Verona

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Masking

NONE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2018-03-29

Primary Completion

2019-12-13

Completion

2020-07-30

FDA Device

Yes

Countries

• United States
• Australia
• Belgium
• Italy
• Japan
• Netherlands
• Spain
• Sweden

Study Locations