Is One Pass Enough for the Diagnosis of the Pancreatic Masses During EUS-FNB?
NCT05436704 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 79
Last updated 2022-06-29
Summary
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with tissue acquisition (TA) is nowadays a well-established technique for the sampling of solid lesions pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Major complications after EUS-TA of solid masses are rare. Several studies have been published in the last recent years aimed to identify factors related to a non-diagnostic or false-negative EUS-FNA, and to improve its diagnostic yield using different needle gauge and different tissue acquisition technique as fanning technique, slow-pull stylet extraction or suction technique.
To overcome this problem, new EUS-TA needles entered in clinical practice to obtain histological specimens increasing the accuracy of the EUS-TA. Preliminary result with these new needles, called EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) are promising with an accuracy rate more than 90%.
Recently, Leungh et al. conducted an observational study to evaluate the role of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of 22G Franseen-tip needle. The study demonstrated that MOSE using the 22G Franseen tip needle could limit needle passes by accurately estimating histologic core fragments. However, the study limitations such as the small sample size and the lack of control group, hampered the value of the conclusions.
So, nowadays, no definitive data regarding how many needle passes need to be performed with FNB needles, neither regarding the use of MOSE to evaluate the specimens obtained with FNB needle. The MOSE technique of the acquired tissue was proposed for the first time by Iwashita et al, using a 19G needle and is nowadays a well-established technique with high accuracy in the final diagnosis.
The aim of our study is to evaluate if during EUS-FNB of pancreatic masses only one needle pass with MOSE evaluation can be satisfactory to obtain a correct diagnosis.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
EUS-FNB
EUS-FNB
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Istituto Clinico Humanitas Mater Domini
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Benedetto Mangiavillano, MD · [email protected]
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-21
- Primary Completion
- 2024-06-30
- Completion
- 2024-06-30
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Percutaneous Versus EUS FNAC in Pancreatic Masses
NCT04623749 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation
NCT01437410 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Suction in the EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04164017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EUS- and US- Guided Biopsy for Pancreatic Lesion
NCT07138976 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
The Accurateness of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in the Guidance of EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04148755 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Contrast Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS), Elastography, and Fractal Analysis in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer Aggressiveness and Response to Therapy.
NCT05591287 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Multi-center, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA on Solid Occupying Lesion
NCT02327065 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Number of To-and-fro Motion in EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Masses
NCT01576497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparing Methods to Biopsy Pancreas Mass
NCT01663493 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS FNB Versus FNA With On-Site Cytopathology in Solid Pancreatic Masses
NCT03485924 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study Comparing Methods of Obtainment of Specimen After EUS-FNA in Patients With Peri-pancreatic Mass
NCT01354795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Efficacy Of 3 EUS-FNB Techniques
NCT05825729 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Multicentered Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial For Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04841616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Pancreatic EUS-FNB With the 20-gauge Procore® and the 22-gauge Acquire® Needles
NCT03567863 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of EUS-FNA on Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
NCT02041897 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency Study of the EUS-FNA Needles With and Without a Side Port in Pancreatic Masses
NCT01978808 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparision of EUS-FNB Techniques for Diagnose of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT05549856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytopathology vs. EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Alone in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03435588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Contrast-enhanced Harmonic and Conventional EUS-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04924725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of a New Core Needle in the Endoscopic Ultrasound Assisted Tissue Sampling for Pancreatic Solid Masses
NCT02946840 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Needles (ProCore vs EchoTip) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Mass Under EUS
NCT01479803 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Olympus EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G in EUS-guided FNB of Solid Pancreatic Masses
NCT02909530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Via EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration With and Without Micro Forceps Biopsies
NCT04404101 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound vs Conventional US-guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Diseases: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05743972 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety of EUS-FNA for Pancreatic Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm (SPN) Before Surgical Resection: the SPN-GRAPHE Series
NCT03749941 ·Status: COMPLETED