Macroscopic on Site Evaluation (MOLSE) vs Standard Specimen Acquisition of Solid Lesions During EUS-FNB
NCT04486274 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 370
Last updated 2020-07-24
Summary
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with tissue acquisition (TA) is nowadays a well-established technique for the sampling of solid lesions pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Actually the standard methods to obtain sampling in gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI solid masses is the fine needle aspiration (FNA) performed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Its sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for malignant cytology are actually reported of 85-95%, 95%-98% and 78-95% respectively. These data could be affected by the presence of cytopathologist in endoscopy room during the tissue sampling. The rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been advocated to significantly increase EUS-FNA accuracy. To overcome this problem fine needle biopsy (FNB) for TA to obtain histological specimens was proposed. These needles allow as the acquisition of an histological specimen than the cytological one with FNA needles. Recently, the need to obtain a histological, instead of a cytological, specimen during EUS has become more urgent and necessary due to innovative oncological treatment options. An acquired histological specimen could avoid the need of a cytopathologist in the endoscopic room, diminishing costs, procedures time, number of passes and reducing the additional costs of a possible repeated EUS-FNA, in case of an inconclusive diagnosis.
With the advent of FNB, the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of the specimen by the endosonographer was proposed, resulting in a comparable alternative to ROSE.
Conditions
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography With Tissue Acquisition
Interventions
- OTHER
-
MOSE
After each pass, the stylet will be introduced into the needle, the material will be released onto a smear slide, and a macroscopic on-site quality evaluation (MOSE) of the specimen will be performed by the endoscopist.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Humanitas Mater Domini
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SEQUENTIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-07-17
- Primary Completion
- 2021-07-31
- Completion
- 2021-07-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Multi-center, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA on Solid Occupying Lesion
NCT02327065 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Contrast-enhanced Harmonic and Conventional EUS-guided Fine-needle Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04924725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation
NCT01437410 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Diagnostic Efficacy Of 3 EUS-FNB Techniques
NCT05825729 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparsion of WT and SNP Techniques of EUS-FNB in Pancreatic Solid Mass (WESP-PSM)
NCT04605042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytopathology vs. EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Alone in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03435588 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study FNB, Is It Time To Abandon Cytological Assessment
NCT04165018 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Suction in the EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT04164017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Number of To-and-fro Motion in EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Masses
NCT01576497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparision of EUS-FNB Techniques for Diagnose of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT05549856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique
NCT01923883 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass: Comparison Between Negative Pressure and Slow-pull Technique
NCT03111368 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus Fanning Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA)
NCT01501903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing of Modified Wet Suction Technique and Dry Suction Technique for EUS-FNA of Solid Occupying Lesions
NCT02789371 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study Comparing Methods of Obtainment of Specimen After EUS-FNA in Patients With Peri-pancreatic Mass
NCT01354795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MOSE to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy During EUS-guided FNA Using a 19-gauge Needle for Solid Lesions
NCT03130140 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Pancreatic EUS-FNB With the 20-gauge Procore® and the 22-gauge Acquire® Needles
NCT03567863 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Diagnostic Value of Different EUS-FNA Techniques
NCT03674710 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of EUS-FNA on Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
NCT02041897 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Methods to Biopsy Pancreas Mass
NCT01663493 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-hypovascular Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Role of EUS
NCT03738280 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic vs Conventional EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04924751 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced EUS Diagnostic Accuracy in the Differential Diagnosis of Subepithelial Gastrointestinal Tumors
NCT04695262 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Red Cell Lysis Buffer Application Versus Conventional Sample Processing in EUS-FNB
NCT05954221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Wet Suction and Dry Suction Technique in EUS-FNA for the Outcomes in Pancreatic Solid Lesions
NCT03821974 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA