MedTrace Logo

The Accuracy of s-CAIS Compared With c-LIS

NCT05361226 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2022-05-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and conventional laboratory-guided implant surgery (c-LIS) in terms of accuracy for single tooth replacement in posterior areas.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant

Interventions

OTHER

Accuracy measurement

Three months following the implant placement, patients were called back to the implant clinic to record the actual implant position with the digital impression technique. Full mouth scans were done by using the intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The surface scans were then exported as an STL file and were imported to coDiagnostiX software. The "Treatment evaluation tool" function tool was used to measure the accuracy of the implant placement which measured the amount of deviation of the placed implant from the planned position. The outcomes were generated into three main parameters.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mahidol University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-07-09
Primary Completion
2020-07-30
Completion
2020-10-30

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05361226 on ClinicalTrials.gov