MedTrace Logo

Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios

NCT06404385 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 27

Last updated 2025-09-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Technological advances have influenced the approach to implant treatment. One of the fields presently experiencing rapid development is static computer-assisted guided surgery (sCAIS), which allows transfer of the virtual implant planning to the mouth of the patient, based on the use of a surgical guide. In sCAIS there is a deviation between the virtually planned implant position and the actual position of the implant placed during surgery. A recent review analyzed only fully guided implants and recorded a mean coronal horizontal deviation (CHD) of 1.12 mm (standard deviation \[SD\] = 0.08), a mean apical horizontal deviation (AHD) of 1.41 mm (SD = 0.1), a mean vertical deviation (VD) of 0.12 mm (SD = 0.23), and a mean angular deviation (AD) of 3.58º (SD = 0.2).

The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of CAD-CAM and conventional guides in candidates for distal free-end implant treatment, and to analyze the effects of possible confounding factors inherent to the patient or the surgical technique employed.A prospective, controlled and blinded quasi-experimental study was carried out involving 27 patients with 76 implants distributed into two groups according to the surgical guide manufacturing approach used: conventional (control group \[CG\]) or CAD-CAM (test group \[TG\]). The implants were planned virtually with the planning software, and the surgical guides were manufactured. Fully guided implant placement was carried out, and the deviations were measured along with other secondary variables as potential confounding factors.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant
  • Computer-assisted

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Static computer-assisted guided surgery with analogic guide

coDiagnostix9® planning software

PROCEDURE

Static computer-assisted guided surgery with CAD-CAM surgical guide

coDiagnostix9® planning software

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Valencia

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • MIGUEL PEÑARROCHA-DIAGO, Phd, DDS · University of Valencia

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-09-11
Primary Completion
2019-12-17
Completion
2019-12-17

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06404385 on ClinicalTrials.gov