Clinical Efficacy of Angulated Screw-retained and Cemented Single Implant Crowns in Esthetic Region

NCT04539912 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-09-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of angulated screw-retained and cemented single implant crowns(SIC) in esthetic region.

Methods/Design: The study was a prospective, single center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with the needs of single tooth restoration in esthetics region were recruited from Oct. 2018 to Aug. 2019. Sixty patients were enrolled in the present study and they were randomly assigned into two groups: angulated screw-retained group(AG, 30 patients) and cemented group (CG,30 patients). Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed on the day of final crowns delivery and 12 months later. Implant survival rate, marginal bone loss(MBL), pro-inflammatory cytokinesin peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF)(TNF-α, IL-6), mechanical complications, peri-implant conditions(mPI, PD, BOP%), pink esthetics score/white esthetics score (PES/ WES) and patients satisfaction were assessed.

Conditions

  • Angulated Screw-retained
  • Esthetics

Interventions

DEVICE

angulated screw retained crown

ASC abutment was used in AG;

DEVICE

cemented crown

prefabricated Ti abutment was used in CG

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Junyu Shi

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-08-01
Primary Completion
2019-08-01
Completion
2020-08-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04539912 on ClinicalTrials.gov