Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac ResYNChronization
NCT05155865 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 62
Last updated 2024-11-01
Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BiV) is the cornerstone treatment for heart failure patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. Recently, a new concept, conduction system pacing (CSP) with permanent pacing, including His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing, has been proposed as a potential alternative to conventional BiV-CRT. The prospective, randomized trial will compare echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical effects of CSP versus conventional BiV pacing in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%), sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. Patients will be randomized to either CSP or biventricular pacing study group and followed up for at least 6 months. The study will explore whether CSP is non-inferior to BiV pacing in echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes.
Conditions
- Dilated Cardiomyopathy with Conduction Defect
- Left Bundle-Branch Block
- Heart Failure
- Resynchronization Therapy
- Cardiac Remodeling, Ventricular
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Resynchronization with conduction system pacing
Implantation of permanent pacemaker with conduction system pacing (preferably left bundle branch) with or without defibrillator lead placement
- DEVICE
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with biventricular stimulation
Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy with biventricular stimulation with or without defibrillator lead placement
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Marta Cvijc, MD · University Medical Centre Ljubljana (Slovenia)
-
Anja Zupan Meznar, MD · University Medical Centre Ljubljana (Slovenia)
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-01-10
- Primary Completion
- 2024-10-28
- Completion
- 2024-10-28
Countries
- Slovenia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07069738 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing Cardiac Resynchronization
NCT00205192 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Contractile Reserve in Dyssynchrony: A Novel Principle to Identify Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT02525185 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Post-market Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized and Single-blinded Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Whether Cardiac Re-Synchronization Therapy (CRT) Using Automatic Continuous Atrioventricular (AV) Delay Optimization is Superior to CRT With Conventional Biventricular Stimulation (BiV).
NCT06044597 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Invasive Method for Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT05868616 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Pilot Study of Interventricular Septal Puncture for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Treat Heart Failure
NCT01818765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Biventricular Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients
NCT05769036 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
AMEND-CRT: Mechanical Dyssynchrony as Selection Criterion for CRT
NCT04225520 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Revisit the Value of Imaging in Best Using CArdiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT02528032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CSP Versus BiVP for Heart Failure Patients With RVP Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06241651 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Triple-site Biventricular Stimulation in the Optimization of CRT
NCT02350842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
His-Bundle Corrective Pacing in Heart Failure
NCT05265520 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of the Cardiac Microcurrent (C-MIC) System With a Less Invasively Placed Left Ventricular Lead
NCT06920030 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)
NCT05652218 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MultiPoint Pacing Programming Guided by Noninvasive Hemodynamics
NCT02064751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of Previously Right Ventricular Paced Heart Failure Patients
NCT01466621 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Characterizing Outcomes and Real-World Experience of Cardiac Physiologic Pacing (The CORE-CPP Study)
NCT06606288 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
NCT00551681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimizing Ventricular Pacing
NCT01611389 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04110431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
NCT05760924 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ENHANCE-Efficacy of the Presence of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing Induced Ventricular Dyssynchrony as a Guiding Parameter for Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Bradycardia and Normal Ejection Fraction
NCT01559311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Right Bifocal Ventricular Cardiac Pacing on Serum Level Natriuretic Peptides in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT02186314 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure
NCT00180258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3