Physiological Effects of Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Versus High-flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Patients At High Risk of Extubation Failure

NCT05012696 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22

Last updated 2024-12-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Weaning is one of the most complex challenges in mechanically ventilated patients. Increased work of breathing after extubation would play a central role in weaning failure. Currently, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is recommended to prevent weaning failure in high-risk patients. On the other hand, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), which is a novel system capable of administering gas mixtures (air and oxygen) with a flow of up to 60 liters/min, has been used to prevent weaning failure in this kind of patients. The use of NIV and HFNC after extubation has been evaluated in some clinical studies. However, the evidence is controversial, and the information regarding the physiological effects that each therapy induces in recently extubated patients at high risk of weaning failure is lacking.

The goal of this proposal is to compare the acute physiological effects of postextubation NIV versus HFNC in critically ill patients at high risk of weaning failure on relevant mechanisms related to weaning failure: Work of breathing, lung function, ventilation distribution, systemic hemodynamics.

This will be a randomized crossover study that will include critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, who fulfill criteria indicating they may be ready for weaning from mechanical ventilation, and in whom a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is planned to determine if they should be extubated. After checking eligibility and obtaining informed consent, patients will be monitored with an esophageal catheter (esophageal/gastric pressures to determine work of breathing, and electric activity of diaphragm to determine neuromechanical coupling), and a noninvasive ventilation monitor (electric impedance tomography to assess global and regional ventilation). Work of breathing, lung function, and systemic hemodynamics will be assessed during the SBT. Inclusion in the study will be confirmed only if they pass the SBT and are extubated. During the first 2 hours after extubation, patients will undergo one hour of NIV and one hour of HFNC, with the crossover sequence being randomized previously at the time of inclusion and with assessments repeated at the end of each treatment period.

Conditions

  • Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation

Interventions

DEVICE

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV)

Non-invasive ventilation will be provided through a mechanical ventilator (Carina, Dräger) through a facial interface (Fitlife Respironics, Philips). A PEEP level between 5 and 10 cmH2O, minimal pressure-support level of 5 cm H2O targeting a tidal volume around 6 to 8 ml/kg and at the same FiO2 applied during the spontaneous breathing trial.

DEVICE

High-flow nasal cannula

High flow nasal cannula will be provided through a commercial device (AIRVO2 + Optiflow nasal cannula, Fisher \& Paykel), at 50 LPM and at the same FiO2 applied during the spontaneous breathing trial.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-16
Primary Completion
2024-04-24
Completion
2024-04-24

Countries

  • Chile

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05012696 on ClinicalTrials.gov