MedTrace Logo

NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation Failure

NCT01852916 · Status: SUSPENDED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2015-08-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to assess whether nasal high frequency ventilation (NHFV) is superior to nasal continuous positive pressure (nCPAP) to prevent tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants less than 28 weeks gestation following first attempt at extubation and removal from mechanical ventilation

Conditions

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

DEVICE

CPAP

Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation using Infant Flow CPAP machine

DEVICE

NHFOV

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Manitoba

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ronald J Baier, M.D. · HSC Neonatology

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Minutes
Max Age
7 Days
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-09-30
Primary Completion
2015-12-31
Completion
2015-12-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01852916 on ClinicalTrials.gov