MedTrace Logo

The Efficiency of HHHFNC Between Unheated Oxygen Therapy in Difficult Weaning Patients After Extubation in RCC

NCT04564859 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2020-09-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the prevention of extubation failure in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Conditions

  • Critically Illness

Interventions

DEVICE

Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Participants using of invasive ventilator more than 14 days, maybe considered transferred to the Respiratory Care Center(RCC), participants enrolled to this study and also written informed consent from participants or their family; After extubation, the difficult weaning patients were allocated to two treatment groups, and randomly assigned to Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula or Noninvasive Ventilation devices.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fu Jen Catholic University

    collaborator OTHER

  • Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Chen-Chun Lin, MD · Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-01
Primary Completion
2019-12-31
Completion
2019-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04564859 on ClinicalTrials.gov