MedTrace Logo

Comparison of 2 Ventilatory Support Strategies During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia

NCT04799691 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 133

Last updated 2022-10-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This retrospective monocentric study compares 2 ventilatory support strategies on outcomes (length of stay, intubation, mortality) in patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit with Covid-19 related pneumonia : invasive strategy used during the first period and non-invasive strategies (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High Flow Nasal Canula, Prone Position) used during the second period.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Invasive ventilation strategy

Use of an invasive ventilatory support strategy

PROCEDURE

Non-invasive ventilation strategies

Use of non-invasive ventilatory support strategies

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Aude Garnero, MD · Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-02-01
Primary Completion
2022-01-15
Completion
2022-01-15

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04799691 on ClinicalTrials.gov