Comparative Study Between One-Shot Dilatation Versus Serial Dilatation Techniques for Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Adult Patients

NCT07279389 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-12-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This comparative study aims to compare and assess the safety, efficacy, outcome, feasibility, intraoperative and postoperative complications of one-shot dilatation versus serial dilatation techniques for access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal stone disease in adult patients.

Conditions

  • Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
  • Renal Stone Disease

Interventions

PROCEDURE

renal dilatation by one-shot dilatation technique

renal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod.

PROCEDURE

renal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken).

insertion of the Alken guide followed by a telescopic dilator between 9Fr to 30Fr, then an Amplatz sheath 30Fr was advanced over the dilator which was then removed, leaving the Amplatz sheath in the collecting system

PROCEDURE

renal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz)

sequential renal dilatation with Amplatz dilator set was used

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hisham Arafa, Consultant · Ain Shams University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-02-27
Primary Completion
2022-08-27
Completion
2023-08-05

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07279389 on ClinicalTrials.gov