Comparison of Digital Intubation (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy
NCT04414839 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 76
Last updated 2020-06-04
Summary
Abstract Background: A number of patients referring to the emergency departments (EDs) due to airway obstruction or decreased level of consciousness require the establishment of a definite airway using intubation. On the other hand, performing Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is very challenging in anesthetized and intubated patients. And, a conclusive method has not yet been presented in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed at comparing Digital Intubation (two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy methods during NGT insertion.
Materials and Methods: The present clinical trial was performed on 76 intubated patients that were randomly divided into two groups. Groups A and B underwent Video Laryngoscopy and Digital Intubation (two-finger) methods, respectively. Then, the success rate, the number of attempts to insert NGT, duration of insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and patients' satisfaction level were recorded and examined in this study.
Conditions
- Intubated Patients
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Digital Intubation (Two-finger)
In the NGT Digital Intubation group (group B), the second and third fingers were placed in the posterior pharynx and depressed the tongue downwards. The NGT was passed through the nose into the posterior pharynx with the fingers in the pharynx to reach the esophagus. The thumb was placed under the jaw and pushed it forward to pave the way for tube insertion.
- DEVICE
-
Video Laryngoscopy
In the NGT Video Laryngoscopy group (group A), first, the GlideScope blade was inserted under direct visualization via color monitor through the patient's mouth by employing jaw-thrust maneuver to preserve the cervical spine and by raising the tongue to obtain better visualization of the larynx space. Then, NGT was inserted through the selected nostril, advanced through the esophagus under direct vision to meet the measured length, and fixed after confirmation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-03-20
- Completion
- 2020-05-15
Countries
- Iran
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Video Laryngoscope, New Intubation Device
NCT02095470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Cuff Inflation-supplemented Videoscope-guided Nasal Intubation
NCT03136549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double-lumen Tube Intubation Technique to Reduce Laryngeal Injuries
NCT01441362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy With Blind Intubation Via Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable
NCT02884895 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT01564082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Hypoxia Between HFNC and SNC in Patient Undergoing UGI Endoscopic Procedures in Deep Sedation
NCT06482879 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Different Tools Inserted Nasal Endotracheal Tube
NCT02448277 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation
NCT02897518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nasal Intubation:a Comparison of Different Endotracheal Tubes
NCT05112783 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02411422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Nasogastric Tube Insertion Success in Difficult and Easy Airway Patients
NCT06002815 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Nasotracheal Tubes on Tube Passage
NCT04695444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Tools to Facilitate Nasotracheal Tube Placement Under Video-laryngoscope Use
NCT03086798 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT01917409 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes
NCT06649526 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT06386757 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Tracheal Tube Fixation Method on Nasal Pressure of Patients With Nasal Tracheal Intubation
NCT04471467 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01099969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Using Video Stylet and Video Laryngoscope in Difficult Intubation of Traumatic Patients .
NCT05143346 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury
NCT05619965 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between VCV and FCV Through Ultra-thin Tube in Upper Airway Surgery
NCT05033730 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation
NCT01235065 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Midline and Right-sided Insertion of the Videolaryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05635500 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA